The Pro-TBC people want to destroy our world again a second time

TBC is definitely better than Classic but WoiLK was WOW’s best.

3 Likes

There’s absolutely nothing to see here except someone who forgot to take their meds today.

“Pro-TBC people” don’t want to destroy your world. They don’t even want to destroy Classic. They just want the opportunity to play TBC on a legacy server, in the same way we’ve got the opportunity to play Vanilla on legacy servers. And it’d be easy enough for both groups to get what they want.

11 Likes

If Blizzard keeps listening to the zoomers, we would be back in square one. TBC is where they listened to the zoomers to begin with and eventually it became retail.

If you want new content… that’s the purpose of retail, it was meant to keep producing new content. If Classic is already boring you, than you’re a zoomer you can always play retail which is always updating with new content.

LFR, no need to run to an instance. No need to have contact with other players and get to the instance in and out as fast as you can. That is retail and zoomer mentality. Go go go mentality. Retail has it’s own charm only if you feel like a zoomer that is.

1 Like

So why not a Wrath server, they want their game play. So what about a Cata server? Or even A MoP server?

i’m all for burning crusades. but there’s no way i want it to be added to classic servers. that’s a ridiculous idea and puts blizzard right back in the same spot they were before classic. its just bad business.

why wouldn’t they do that? probably be a classic version of every expansion every 2 years along with a new retail expansion. in other words, one release per year.

assuming its retaining and drawing players. i don’t see them not doing it. the rest of the expansions beyond classic will be far easier/cheaper for them supposedly.

2 Likes

Most bc fans i have seen want it on separate servers.

3 Likes

classic servers will become tbc servers with an option to migrate to new classic servers for the few that want to remain big fish. there will be two types of classic servers, ladder (seasonal) and standard.

1 Like

what did i just read.

nochanges. it means no changes. ports to tbc if you want or start fresh or use a premade 60.

dont’ change my classic servers.

1 Like

did a stutter, or is it just late for you?

that’s not nochanges.

By the time TBC is on the table, we’ll have been in Classic for several years. It’s going to stagnate.

1 Like

you mean like the pserver stagnation over the past decade?

1 Like

Blizzard will not announce Classic+ or TBC servers. It’s just stupid at this point.

Nostalrius wasn’t 10 years old. It was resetting so people could do it again - and there was stagnation, don’t pretend like there wasn’t. People came and went, people raid logged.

1 Like

that is no changes, it’s vanilla progression just like it happened.

2 Likes

they already said they were working on tbc and bragged how easy it’ll be to do.

1 Like

of course people come and go but there’s always going to be enough coming and going to at least have one decently popped server.

of course, i’m assuming blizzard will have the decency to merge servers when it gets to that, they do like to take their sweet time with that.

in the end. completely unnecessary to get rid of a player draw and replace it with something else when they can have both available.

3 Likes

Ur move Blizz

no, that’s tbc progression. vanilla stopped at 1.12

well, if you want to get overly nitpicky 1.12.2

that’s no changes. classic won’t be static, they already proved that by having phases. phase 7 will be 2.X