https://www.pcgamer.com/this-is-how-blizzard-plans-to-finally-bring-back-vanilla-wow-servers/
There you go.
2 Likes
So a grand total of one (1) time that changes were implemented to the original vanilla WoW, the result ultimately led to the BFA we have today. All you need is to do one (1) single change differently, and your slippery slope has slid you somewhere else. The idea that you either have classic exactly as it is now or you have BFA is ridiculous. The fact that we do have a living example of a possible undesirable endpoint is all the more reason to expect that a redo would get us somewhere better. Especially one guided by the community who wanted classic to begin with 100% of which have complaints against retail to some degree.
So you’re still trolling?
No, you are the one who is obviously trolling. Anyone reading this thread with an education past 8th grade can see that.
I didn’t accuse anyone of trolling. Did you mean to reply to someone else?
Yet you keep harassing me for my opinion and throwing insults in there as well.
Good show man, way to expose the real you lol
You ever watch The Office? This is like that part where MIchael Scott yells out, " I declare bankruptcy!". Just because you feel like declaring that the argument is logically flawed, doesn’t mean that it is. If you want to provide some of that logic, you are welcome to do so.
Likely OPs main. ESAD, you’ll never get your duel spec.
What changes would only get a single no?
You have any evidence of that claim?
The slippery slope argument is stupid. Like i stated before though, if we want something other than an authentic classic experience then you essentially want a different game. Make a new thread for classic + which would be a new game / server while maintaining the original classic. Which it should also come a while after classic has run it’s course.
Slippery slope arguments are almost invariably logical fallacies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeYou have the lowest IQ
Yeah, that’s great. It still doesn’t say that they don’t want people to stick around. It says if millions show up and play for years that’s great, and if tens of people show up and play for years that’s great.
it doesn’t say if millions show up and we end up with tens playing that they are okay with that. You’re reading into it something that they didn’t say.
So you’ve made several claims now with no evidence yet I’m suppose to give you evidence of my one claim… interesting.
All you can do is throw insults my way, what a real tough guy lolol
They are okay with that though, they don’t care how many people quit.
Sick name for your hunter lmao
Me orc
Me have wolf in name
Me not smart
Me orc
Well we will just differ then, because I absolutely think they care and that it matters to them.
“If millions of people show up and play for years”
“if just tens of people show up and play for years”
I think I’m reading what’s there just fine.
How are you doing on that score?
2 Likes
Are you making a slippery slope argument? Then you are being logically fallacious.