That looks like exactly what happens in the clip from awc. What did the combat log say happened to the flurry ticks?
That they didnât do damage to me. Iâm just using the default combat log and it doesnât show xyz damage (deflected) or (immune) or whatever. I know thereâs like an advanced option or an addon or something to get deeper than that but I didnât bother.
I will when I come back to this
Well, this is awkward.
Hit the hunter pet, not a dummy
It should effectively be the same. We can retest if you really want though.
Hit the hunter, a dummy
The rogue was hitting a pve training dummy. My test the rogue was hitting my pet. I donât have an explanation for the dummy but lots of stuff doesnât work right on the dummy.
Oh good someone else said it. I have to do the same thing with Evasion against Arms and I was chuckling reading all of this.
That is literally the same Blade Flurry bug from SL where they hit the pet and cleave you through turtle. This was already talked about.
Incorrect. That little âdelayâ is called latency.
So who is moving goal posts now?
I mean different test conditions arenât really the same thing as moving goalposts
We are currently retesting. Would you like to redact any statements for posterity before posting?
No I want to see how you did it differently than I did. Definitely willing to be wrong if I didnât test it correctly.
Now we just need Battlecruisr in here as well for the triple beatdown.
Is there a clear difference in testing parameters
I guess my pet was too far away. Iâm wrong on blade flurry bug. Congratulations forum squad. Hope your day is made.
Extra context: We tested three times. The first time they werenât recording, but it went through.
The second time, it didnât. I was out of range because I was standing on the far side of the pet from Verann. This is probably why you werenât being hit in your tests.
The third time, they were recording, and I was in range.