Well I certainly don’t speak for anyone else here when I say this, but I don’t feel that way at all. I enjoyed ranged SV, I enjoy Melee SV, although i do wish it were buffed in the AOE department with some changes. I’m not opposed to RSV coming back, and I’m certainly not afraid of losing anything. I play the game and if there’s a change I dislike I play something else, it’s really not that serious. This is just a game after all, not real life.
I understand where both parties are coming from with the "Move on" and "we shouldn't have to" movements. I say do what you want, preach what you want, and I hope everyone ends up happy in the end :) :slight_smile:
When someone tells another to just “move on” it just incites them to be even more vocal. When someone is already agitated there nothing that will call them down until they say what they have to.
It just a better solution to ending an argument quick than to keep replying back, if you do not feed the fire it will just burn its self out.
So people should move on when asking for a deleted spec to be returned, but people shouldn’t move on from posting on the Hunter forums telling people to ‘move on’? People can ‘move’ on if they want to ‘move on’. Heck, many have moved on… but they would like back what was lost. I play Classic now, but still post to say that I want retail Hunter to be good again. That is the purpose of player feedback. We shouldn’t just accept any and all bad changes, just being told to ‘move on’.
I don’t think they should move on but I also think that if they planned to make Surv fully ranged again or add the 4th spec they would’ve announced it by now. So i guess its better luck next expac lol.
You’re probably not wrong, but if people wait until the next xpac to be announced to voice their want of RSV back as a 4th spec at least, it’ll be too late then too.
I like both melee and ranged survival, and all current hunter specs.
Saying that though, all hunter specs were basically obliterated by the Legion class changes, with none of them completely resembling their old form. Survival mains felt it the worse since they were the only ones who were changed to melee.
I mention it because, in some alternate universe where Blizz kept survival ranged, the spec would still have zero resemblance to old survival either way… Maybe we should ask for a return to old class design philosophy in general, and not specifically ranged skills for surv?
Or not, in which case I still personally love melee surv just as much as the old one.
And you are perfectly welcome to have that opinion, but those of us who don’t like MSV are going to keep giving our feedback on the issue, and hopefully Blizz will listen and consider giving us what we lost as a 4th spec, so the MSV crowd won’t have to go through what RSV hunters did and have their playstyle taken from them.
I mean I highly doubt that will ever happen, you can’t go one week without someone making a new post on removing MSV or adding RSV back in as a 4th spec. I’m 100% sure they will keep this same energy until they either announce its being add back in or until Wotlk classic. Im sure even if they give hunters multiple blue post stating SV will stay melee, people will continue to advocate for it until Blizz gives in.
Blizz literally said at Blizzcon in relation to making vanilla servers “You think you do, but you don’t.” And you know what happened, a few years later they caved. So Blizz can make all the blue posts they want, they’ve already shown they will cave to public pressure even if it takes years.
Did you though? Cause I never stated they should stop I merely stated that if they were going to announce it for this expac it would have been stated already.
You may read what you like to in my post but what you won’t do is say I said something I didn’t. You defiantly tried that.