No it isn’t lol. If it is designed around min maxers it IS worse for me. There doesn’t need to be compromise here. You just don’t get to min max this specific thing.
So yes you just want it worse for min/maxers else it’s worse for you.
I guess it’s clear.
And I hope Blizzard understand that people that stand for this do this from spite or hate.
I’m just going to choose what the character would choose and deal with it. There’s so many more important things to care about.
2 Likes
For you and that’s fine have fun your way, there are many ways to play.
I’m a roleplayer on a roleplay server and I think covenant restrictions are absolute rubbish.
1 Like
I want it better for the 95% of people that are not min maxers rather than the 5%. That is not spite, that is better for the health of the game overall. You just make up your own conclusions based on fallacious ideas you manufacture in your own head.
And it can be better for 100% of the people instead of 95%. It’s not fallacious, you don’t want that 5% to have fun.
You do know the game director is a known high level raider and has been known as one since before he went to work for Blizzard.
1 Like
No it can’t lol. There is no place where changing covenants will be better for everyone. Most players don’t want to have to respec for every single type of content or be gimped.
Honestly don’t care about covenant restrictions, we had to regrind rep in BC for aldor and scryers if we wanted to switch, so long as the restriction for switching isn’t crazy obnoxious I don’t see it becoming a huge issue for the average person.
You can’t prove this actually.
We will be able to change them no matter, we just don’t know how.
You don’t think it can, I believe it can.
If anything the possibility exist, you’re just being a contrarian on that possibility.
A game with Heroic Dungeons and LFR, but also allowing players have the option to swap covenants freely isn’t “catering” to the min/maxers.
Giving multiple types of players options to play how they want isn’t catering to any single type - it’s quite the oppostie, by allowing people to exercise player agency to make choices throughout an expansion that promote fun gameplay.
2 Likes
You are saying it will be better for 100% of players, which is a lie. Just because there may be a way to change it does not mean it is anything like being able to change once a day or some other frequency.
I don’t want it to be easy to change or else I feel like I have to in order to perform - and so do group leaders who then make it an issue to get into content. Rather just have it the way it is where it is not a simple switch. You can disagree all day but it doesn’t make you right.
Thing is rp players want to force everyone to play the way they do .
If you look at my armory I don’t do any min/max type content but the thing is I don’t rp and I do like to push myself so min/maxing fits more of how I like to play .
All of us that want choice actually mean that we want you to enjoy how you play so let us enjoy how we want to play.
All these people going no it should be how we want it and you all can kick rocks sound like pertinent children going either you play it my way or I am taking my toys and leaving.
Wrong, if there is the option to change and you want to get into groups you have to take the optimal route or face discrimination.
1 Like
Agreed, but the person you’re replying to is motivated by only one thing: He enjoys it that people who do more difficult things than he does are upset.
That’s the only reason he’s trying to come up with justifications for the proposed system.
That’s not my motivation at all but keep lying
Of course it is. There is ZERO loss to you if other people have better choices with fewer grinds.
You want other people to have to grind more, because it gives you pleasure to see them unhappy.
1 Like
I’m saying there is a way for it to be better for 100% of the players, that is a possibility.
We don’t know, you don’t know. I’m stating the fact we will be able to change, so it would be wrong to say that were totally locked into one. The question then is just how much for you is enough time or enough cost to change. For me a cost means it’s paywalled, it’s just bad for the game to paywall features. While time can be more interesting.
And group leaders can ask you then to make 4 of the same class to play all covenants, or to play the right covenant. I think you don’t understand that people will min/max it not matter what, going agaisn’t will be more problematic for casuals players or players that don’t play more than one character.
Yes there is actually because that becomes the paradigm for everyone. We have seen it time and time again. If you don’t take the optimal path you are discriminated against. It has nothing to do with this made up lie you have about me taking joy in seeing other players not be able to do something. It is about not having your playstyle imposed on everyone else.