They should turn Nazjatar into a realm and banish you there forever!
Then you have nothing to worry about, because nobody will activate No Flying Mode.
It remains to be seen how successful classic will be after 14 yearsā¦ Classic has been around two months and masses of people have stopped playing that already. I donāt think you can consider classic a āsuccessā of the nature you want the current version to repeat anyway.
You already get a huge bonus for not flying. You donāt have to do pathfinder.
Oh sure, heās correct, a lot of players donāt like those QoL. But many, many more do like them.
See how easy it is to claim things without evidence?
I would sacrifice flying for better rewards considering there is a finite number of WQs available each day. Flying gets them done faster, but you donāt get more out of it.
look at how well the āembrace this change, and move forwardā mentality has treated retail WoW. WoW subs spiked 223% when classic released.
Retail has issues with the way the game is treated by developers and the several systems implemented, different difficulties, catchup systems every patch, and worst of all is world quests.
I see no data for the sub amount but sure, letās go with a 223% spike.
How many of those are going to stay more than 2 months?
no point in arguing. Subs spiked, classic is better than WoW for a myriad of reasons. Retail just likes to burn itself. Have fun with it.
Only a single piece of evidence, please. I want data.
Wonder why that would be?..I wonderā¦
Maybe because flying is much more fun than not flying. Been that way since BC.
Oh sure, heās correct, a lot of players donāt like those QoL. But many, many more do like them.
See how easy it is to claim things without evidence?
I agree, many people do like them, just as many people donāt like them. Seems rather obvious, the evidence for that lies in the plethora of complaints seen over the last 8 years, and then also in the counter-argumentative attitudes of those who do like the changes.
I never claimed that āthere are more players who dislike the changes than those who do like the changesā, as Iād need hard evidence to be able to back that up, which I havenāt and wonāt bother to gather. Iād be an idiot if I said that.
h ttps://www.newsweek.com/world-warcraft-subscriptions-triple-classic-release-1461086
First search. An article that shows the information, and a link to where they got their information
So now prove to me that all those people came back because classic has no flying.
This is an interesting idea. I like it. I suggest that in no flying mode that there are more hidden chests/treasures and more bonus stuff from exploring.
I dont think you can prove thats why. I think its overall just a better experience for the players. Whats the fun in logging in to do world quests or do another M+.
Nothing like getting your BiS from a titanforged piece of world quest loot that you really worked hard to earn
I do think classic has a MUCH MUCH better reward structure than current wow but Iāll take flying ANY day over classic.
I dont think you can prove thats why. I think its overall just a better experience for the players. Whats the fun in logging in to do world quests or do another M+.
I canāt wait to log on classic to whack a mob for 3 hours just to be able to use a weapon properly.
I canāt wait to log on classic to whack a mob for 3 hours just to be able to use a weapon properly.
at least its 3 hours you can play the game. Hell, make an intellect set to level up weapon skill much faster.
Much better than 15 of my BiS pieces needing to be titanforged, perfect roll.
Most classic players that are above level 50 understand how stats impact their character. Much more in depth
I canāt wait to log on classic to whack a mob for 3 hours just to be able to use a weapon properly.
I cant wait to log in and get to max level in 3 hours
at least its 3 hours you can play the game
idk man most people afk that part of the game.
I cant wait to log in and get to max level in 3 hours
You know very well this is inaccurate, and are grasping at straws to make your point.