Converting that gold to bnet balance is paying Blizzard real money. For a mount, that should’ve been awarded in the game, that wouldn’t have been giving them money.
I don’t really know if that is the case. People said why they are happy with the mounts others said why they don’t want to see a cash shop in a subscription game when it seems the game itself suffers for it or at the very least the cash shop has far more effort put into its models.
I don’t really see a lot of people going after other people just disagreeing with the practice.
OK, then the numbers in your bank account are imaginary following your own logic; and it isn’t money.
Someone bought a token, which gives them money(Or, as you put it ‘imaginary currency that doesn’t exist’) which you would then use and convert it to $15 of their ‘imaginary money’, twice. Then use $25 of that ‘imaginary money’ to buy the mount, which in effect did indeed give them far more money.
You gave Blizzard that money buy using those tokens on your account for their form of currency.
Visit the Auction House and use your hard-earned gold to purchase one of the WoW Tokens another player has put up for sale. Once the Token arrives in your in-game mailbox, right-click it to add it to your bag, then right-click again to add either 30 days of game time, or redeem it for Blizzard Balance to be added to your account.
Took my derailment argument out of the thread. This covers it all and why being wrong for the sake of being wrong isn’t worth it. Please don’t derail their thread further by being confused about how the token works when you’re using gold to add bnet balance.
I apologize for the other person who can’t accept being wrong. I regret even giving them attention.
I’m $50 poorer actually because I bought one for my best friend and myself.
And for you people complaining that you can’t earn this in-game, 2 tokens are worth less than a Lightforged Warframe. Convert your gold into $15 balance per token, and tada. The mount is $25, so 2 tokens.
One last thing before I go cause some of you people need to hear this; what I do with my money is none of your business. If I like a cosmetic item in the store and it costs real life money, you’re damned right I’m going to buy it and buy my friends some, too.
Game time = $15, converted balance = $15. Both of which are giving Blizzard money, which is one of the complaints about store mounts because they are not earnable in game without giving Blizzard money.
I buy the mounts I want when they go on sale…funny enough I don’t remember when the last sale was. I won’t pay 25$ because just for -me- that’s a bit much. crosses fingers for a future sale
You buy 2 game tokens (that someone else paid $20 each for your gold) then put into Bnet balance worth $30, pay for $25 mount and have $5 left over in the balance account.
You only spent game gold for that.
I understand what you’re saying - Blizzard got $40 while you got a $25 mount with the token exchange (with leftover balance). So if your basic idea is to “screw over Blizzard” then that’s a failure.
But if you’re a poor person and just want the mount, you can get it for game gold - which is what the seller of the token wants.
Best to just let it go. They seriously believe they’re right and no amount of convincing them will work. I even copy pasted it word for word about how you can redeem blizzard store credit from the token purchased with gold.
You simply cannot argue with a wall.
They’re 100% convinced the credit they award you for the token bought via in game gold somehow is real money that they will then pay to themselves again. Ignoring the fact that they already had that money thanks to the person who bought the token with real money to place on the auction house.
Yes, but I’m more amazed people paid 230 K for it. I see it as worth 25 bucks.
Gold is always worth more, to me. I used to pay 20 bucks for gold, sometimes, when it was as high as 200 K plus; I’ve not found it worth 20 bucks to buy gold under 200 K (got spoiled.) I’ve bought all the sub 1 million mounts, both from NPCS and players, that I could. There are still a couple on the AH I can’t afford yet (that bug one/whatever the thing is.)
I never feel I have enough gold, though the paragon supplies (at 4 K each) are kind of starting to get me there. I just logged in again, after playing RDR2 Online on the Xbox One A LOT, and already got my first Paragon supplies (7th legion.)
Honestly, 4 K a pop makes Paragon caches worth more to me than they were in Legion. In Legion there was a LOW chance to get a mount, but I did SO MANY without getting the mount (still have 3 of the mounts to get, with so many Paragons done on two difference characters.)
Without giving them additional money than what you already paid for the rest of the game. Paying gold for something in game doesn’t give them money unless you purchased a token for that gold or use that gold to purchase a token.
You are paying for the mount with gold by converting tokens into Blizzard balance. You are earning an in-game reward the same way you would buy a mount off a vendor.
If this was pre-Legion your argument would have merit. It is not. We have tokens now and as such can earn these mounts with gold, an ingame currency.
You’re not giving Blizzard anything. The person buying the token with real money to gain gold is. You are giving the person who bought the token with real money gold and earning Blizzard balance with an in-game currency.
I can’t explain this to you in a simpler way. Peace.
You are basically one of the reasons why we are getting triple dipped for money in their SUB game. Problem is people like you will pay for this kind of stuff.
There are many of us who think spending more money for a mount in a SUB game is awful and sets a bad precedent and we would like to earn cool mounts by playing the game.