Maybe, but when he takes things like “I want content that can be overcome by gear” to mean I don’t want hard/challenging content, I don’t find that to be arguing in good faith.
Just to sum it up for you, I would be after content that the bulk of players can eventually do, some get it done right off the bat, some around mid tier, and some just barely get it done in time for the next patch or expansion.
Does this mean I don’t want challenging content? to Snozh it does.
That’s not what I’m doing. I’m saying these behaviors are against the rules, citing the rule in question, and I have observed this person repeatedly engaging in them.
Lmao, that’s legitimately all you do. You start arguments all the time because you jump to conclusion or misunderstand what’s being discussed.
See how all you can do is play the victim and accuse people of “misgendering” you “intentionally”? Even when I ignored it the first time, you made your second post all about it.
Except you can’t cite any posts, and you can’t cite what Blizzard defines as disruptive either.
Me and many others view yours, snoz, and sos’s posts as disruptive and starting fights including INSULTING other posters and MAKING NON-CONSTRUCTIVE POSTS.
There’s you starting a fight with me and being disruptive, along with derailing the thread.
Except all my parses and scores were higher than yours.
You doing so, again. Intentionally misgendering someone is indeed, starting a fight, and considered hate speech in some countries.
After you linked a thread, where you also intentionally misgendered me and I corrected you there (respectfully) and you never apologized for it and went on a whole 10 post+ rant here about it?
Yeah, asked where I started a fight, personally insulted someone, or did anything you claimed.
Keyword, start by the way.
Nope, now it’s quite ironic because you’re now starting more of a fight, and disrupting things because you:
No source for that accusation? I also never asked for an apology, I said you never apologized as further evidence it was intentional. It’s a repeated observed behavior.
Yes, keyword is start. You started the whole derailed argument because I quickly wrote “he” instead of “Pawzer” and you couldn’t correct me or let it go. You immediately jumped to making accusations of misgendering.
No, you derailed the thread and started an argument before that. Try again.
Ironically, you both liked this post which was (Again) someone coming in to derail, throw shade, and personally insult. Proving my point with haste, imagine that!
I linked the other thread about parses and only talked about parses. You saw 1 word, “he”, and jumped into attack mode and made accusations instead of simply correcting me.