Ion never actually said Sylvanas was morally grey. He said Azeroth is a world of greys.
More like a blueish golden bubbling brook.
The planet, not the Titan. The Titan is baby
Woah didnât know I encounter this topic again now lol
Of course itâs still ongoing. Haha
Itâs not finished yet.
Bad Blizz! Bad!
Two Years and this lie is still floating around? Blizzard has never said Sylvanas was morally grey, thatâs something the player base just made up.
The real quote is
âAzeroth is a world of grey; itâs never been a world of black and white.â
Said during a Q&A in April of 2018
https://youtu.be/AUik9-2ygS8?t=3578
With that powerful beard comes wisdom!
She has gray skin ⌠But no morality⌠at all
I bet Blizz expected more people to just be on board with whatever Sylvanas does. Turns out most people donât want to be the Saturday morning cartoon villain.
Not taking a side, but how did Blizzard lie about Sylvanas? This is a genuine question.
No, but Travis Day said she âis not evilâ and that sheâs not really âacting in a cruel, mustache-twirling evil way.â
Source:
I remember seeing that âmorally greyâ thing (or something like it) in reference to the tree burning, around the time the identity of the burner was supposed to be some great mystery.
BfA doesnât win the award for worst character development (that goes to Grommash in WoD, from warlord And enslaver to âDraenor is freeeeeeeee!â) But Sylvanas as a character is honestly dead to me. I was hoping that BfA would be the chance for her character to become a true member of the Horde; instead, we got MoP 2.0 done infinitely worse than the first time around. And she looked so much more ridiculous as a threat than Garrosh ever did, because she wasnât even a big threat for a while. And her power growth being largely off screen is absolutely ridiculous.
The constant lies regarding the story worsened the whole expansion for me. First the tree (even when it was revealed at BlizzCon, I remember hearing more audible groans than cheers) and then the âmorally grayâ peddling, it felt like the writers were mocking the players. Iâm sure they werenât, b it they really didnât consider the impact of their lies on how players would receive the story, and now you have a good number very unhappy with the over all narrative.
Sylvanas has been front and center for more of WoWâs life than virtually any other character; she needs to go, and she needs to go as soon as possible in Shadowlands. She wonât, because sheâs the lead writerâs Queen, but she needs to to salvage this laughable story.
The thing is we still have no real concept of Sylvanasâs motives.
Everything strikes me as her being written to appear the villain but in the end will actually turn out to be more of an anti-hero.
They might think thatâs what theyâre writing, but itâs going to be very, very hard to find a motivation sufficient to justify Sylvanasâs actions in BfA.
She basically has the same goal Arthas had and that is remake the world of azeroth in undeath. maybe theyâll do a redemption of Arthas in the maw and he comes back to end here in the 2nd to last raid like Illidan did to Guldan.
I still remember when people were speculating on if it was even going to be The Horde who burns Teldrassil.
The best and most outlandish Horde cope theory I saw was Genn being responsible for a false flag attack.
Would have been better if it was azshara trying to rile up tensions.
Her story isnât done. I believe sheâs going to be redeemed in SL.
âThere are no Old Gods in BfA.â
"We think corruptions were a great success."
You legit cannot trust anything this company says these days.
2 Likes
Well is sure fueled all the speculation about who was responsible for the âBurningâ. I loved all the wild theories about who could have done it while over looking the most obvious person.