To be fair…
I don’t know of many(any) people that where specifically asking for:
-Sharding
-backporting from the modern client
-modern graphics for environment, including water (which has gameplay implications via visibility differences)
-Loot trading
-Removal of spell batching (massive game play change)
-Trivialization of the early raid content via 1.12 itemization, balance, debuff limits and threat generation… which in turn leads to:
-Massive disruption to overall itemization on the populace. Very Very few people completed Molten Core in OG vanilla, I fully expect that number to drastically increase with how undertuned it is for 1.12, which means tons more people than would be remotely “authentic” are going to be running around in raid level gear
-Indefinite duration servers… Another massive departure from authenticity… You didn’t get years within which to progress when OG vanilla was current content.
-No acknowledgment of problems Pservers have already shown to have with hindsight. Things like Tribute soloing hunters, and mage aoe farms can be massively disruptive to the overall economy, particularly on indefinite servers… Other things like class population figures changing heavily from vanilla numbers via people knowing better than to willingly “lose at the character select screen”, or even broken itemization concerns like Wolf’shead helm (which largely wasn’t known about in real vanilla)
-The idea that the very nature of vanilla balance being an ever evolving fluid thing suddenly turning into a flat static thing is a change in and of itself.
-Significant UI, Macro, and Addon revamps… numerous vanilla era addons will blatantly not work
That’s a wealth of changes and hits to alleged “authenticity” already, and while some are small and benign, many of them are fairly underestimated by most in their impact. Spell Batching, for example, completely redefines the entire combat system the game is based upon.
I don’t always agree with Ziryus (in fact, I rarely end up agreeing with him beyond desire to see better spec balance as a generalized concept, despite us differing heavily in exactly how to go about that, or the scope it should take), but he’s not objectively wrong in his assessment here, even if his post you quoted was rather petty and trollish in nature bringing about that point.