Lakeshire Vanilla: https://i.imgur.com/qnk11ph.jpg
Lakeshire BfA with Inky Black Potion: https://i.imgur.com/ss5H8Ju.png
Lakeshire BfA without Inky Black Potion: https://i.imgur.com/hKABc6a.png
Admit you’re wrong and I’ll forgive you.
I dont need your forgiveness.
I’ll take that as you admitting being wrong. Glad I could help educate you.
And once again, you show how wrong you are and how you leap to astonishing bad assumptions. Seems to be a pattern with you.
No you said,
So not quite what you supposedly said.
Not quite rambling either. I addressed every one of your points and even clarified my position. If you don’t want answers or clarification then don’t ask. Pretty simple concept.
The person I also replied to was in reference to dual spec and I simply stated what was said by Ion at blizzcon. But you watched the videos so you know that.
So are you or are you not trying to validate dual spec because of the possibility (more than likely are) putting in graphical updates?
I mean since that what this whole discussion stemmed from and realistically the only reason you would post what you did is in an attempt to do so.
I would almost understand if you were somewhat confused on the discussion if I had used the reply instead of quoting the poster but I did quote him so there should be no confusion.
You replied to him with an all-encompassing statement that covers more than just dual spec. I don’t care about dual spec, you invited this argument by choosing your words poorly.
Instead of trying to insult my intelligence with snide passive-aggressive remarks, take culpability and focus on improving your own argumentative abilities so we may focus on dialectic.
so someone is trying to justify dual spec being added cause some graphical upgrades that might not even be in the game so why not ?
talk about slippery slope . and they said it diddnt exist.
2 Likes
Don’t try to make sense of pro changers.
One of them literally said we should add dual spec because it saves money, then wanted proof when we said it would have an impact on the economy.
5 Likes
Proof you have still yet to provide other than your speculation. Inflation doesnt matter if everyone is in the same boat. There is no interest rate in WoW. My original intent to have it added was not because it saved money, it saved time. You turned it into this economy smashing super classic destroying nightmare by basically just adding numbers together. Sure I could do the same thing but the reason I ask for proof is because yes I can add that together but there is no way to say that it will happen that way. Too many variables.
Blizz has not ruled out dual spec or cheaper respec costs.
Dual spec didn’t exist until WotLK. It has absolutely no place in Classic.
As for cheaper respecs, why would they do that? The data is going to be as it was in 1.12 in 99% of cases.
1 Like
They haven’t ruled it out. Same with mail system, lfg.
They basically have. They aim to make the game like 1.12 Vanilla. Dual Spec didn’t come until several years later.
1 Like
And sharding ks in play thank God. No one wants to wait around in busy zones
1 Like
Vanilla nights were slightly darker.
There is nothing passive aggressive about my replies so stop trying to victimize yourself.
If your intelligence feels threatened or insulted I am truly sorry.
You are correct it is an all encompassing statement which is exactly what Ion made.
An all encompassing statement.
How many time did he say they dont want to change 1.12 data or content? 3 or 4 times in that relatively short clip?
Do you know for 100% certain that upgraded graphics are not related to stability or 16:9 support that they said we were going to get months ago after they had started work on it?
If you do post some form of evidience from anything other than back in 11/17 before they even hired a team or started work on it.
As i have said earlier i have not said anything that has not been said by blizzard.
If you cannot believe the dev and panel videos from blizzcon then how can you believe they will turn sharding off or include a whole host of other (imo) unneeded qol improvements?
2 Likes
Is there looting being traded from one person to another? That would count as loot trading. You can cut a Pie 1000’s of different ways, in the end its still a pie though.
Don’t be dumb…again, if you and others have a problem with it don’t play or don’t trade loot, you know you don’t have to trade your loot right? You can be a jerk if you choose…its sad/funny and a little fake when people get mad at the loot trading, like I’ve said in the past some of you are just looking for a fight, looking for something to complain about.
1 Like
Right… but that doesn’t make it part of the game’s function. A GM intervening to fix something doesn’t justify those actions being automated and added to the game.
Legitimate loot trading wasn’t in Vanilla. I don’t care how you want to twist it.
I would also add that having it be a base feature of the game removes a barrier to doing it.
With a GM ticket you had to actually put in the ticket and wait for the GM to respond. In Vanilla, that could mean waiting 3-7 days.
With it as part of the game, you can do it in a matter of seconds by merely opening a trade window.
3 Likes
Some zones were slightly darker and some were slightly brighter than they are now.