Okay i got to know…
/google
The mobile version of DC Comics’ fighting game Injustice 2 found itself in hot water earlier today after announcing an in-game challenge meant to celebrate LGBTQ+ Pride Month. The problem was that the event tasked players with beating the crap out of Poison Ivy, a canonically bisexual character, hundreds of thousands of times. A strange way to celebrate!
“That’s hilariously tone deaf,” wrote one ResetEra user in response to a promotional tweet, which has since been removed.
“At least they got the rainbow profile pic,” wrote another, pointing out the hypocrisy that corporations employ every June to appear progressive on LGBTQ+ issues by simply adding rainbows to their logos.
“Ah, the beloved pride celebration of repeatedly punching a barely clothed bi woman in the face,” wrote a third.
Okay i’m a little weirded out by this…
Because isn’t in the comics, movies or games, Posion Ivy’s the villian? Idk, i don’t follow Batman, i just play Arkham City and going off a few of 90’s shows, as well the Kiling Joke cartoon. (also, wasn’t Batwoman straight in that cartoon?..)
Plus, isn’t this a fighting game?.. Where people go and essentially beat the crap out of each other?.. Injustice storyline aside?..
And why i have a sneaking suspection, the more i read this article, that if it’s the other way around, it would be seen as completely a-okay?
And why this person writing the article acted somewhat surprised that a fighting game has challenges that relates to fighting?
I’m not a developer by any stretch of the imagination, but it couldn’t have been any harder to design than what was ultimately programmed into the game for this event.
I’m honestly curious on which they think is the better way to handle this then. Because if were saying that violence towards BI is bad (Whether it be against or as them) then pretty much that crosses off the challenges more or less. so now what? just cosmetics?