I am so positive. Thank you for checking.
Are you aware that resto shaman can have a hard time to heal people that are more than 20 yards apart (in shadowlands?) Might still be true now, but don’t play the spec, don’t know.
2 Likes
I don’t know either but apparently Resto Shaman is in a garbage spot not exactly sure why though so 
Like I don’t care too much either way given up on asking it be changed although would prefer the 40yds just don’t think it’s exactly a decision that should be supported or defended.
Totally fine with breaths / AOE heals staying the same - but no reason for echo, living flame, dispel to have the penalty. . tbh dispel one of the most annoying ones - huge QoL
Pres would not suddenly be demanded if they had that just QoL
3 Likes
That why I wont play Fistweaver or HPal…uggh
But let me add, I won’t crap on those playstyles as many like it and we are allowed different play styles.
Man you dungeon lords arguing about imaginary parse numbers in scripted encounters are really funny. They buffed preservation because it sucks in rated pvp, where the range limitation has an actual tradeoff – being closer to enemies means you’re much more susceptible to cc and swaps than all the other healers.
Pres evoker is higher rated than mw monk, disc priest, holy paladin, holy priest, resto shaman. (Solo shuffle.)
I guess solo shuffle isn’t real pvp.
I also see evokers before some other classes, and I think at least one of them is pres. For 2v2/3v3.
People not liking something doesn’t make it weak.
Almost as cute as you thinking the buff was strictly for PvP (which would actually be in the notes), a wow mini-game that Blizzard hasn’t cared about for over a decade 
.
3 Likes
Ya, pretty sure that would have been in the note too. It was a PvE buff.
Okay pixel slayer lmao there’s never been a time when they buffed a spec in both types of content because it was severely lacking in one. Preposterous! Blizzard would never do that.
Go back to your route planning, maybe you can shave off a millisecond by getting a rat to snap or something.
You’re either huffing copium; looking at the data after they buffed preservation; or you’re just living in bizarro world; but preservation has never been above any of those specs except for holy priest since S1.
1 Like
You seem like you need therapy more than these forums, my guy.
That’s exactly correct, glad you’re catching on bud. Any time a buff is strictly for PvP, that’s explicitly called out in the notes, and it doesn’t actually apply to PvE as that would break balance.
If it’s not, then the buff is intended to improve both aspects of play. Any time PvP is the intended goal of a buff, it’s not only mentioned in the notes, but in the explanation as well (because PvP is an afterthought in this game).
It’s always so funny when PvP Andys think that belittling the actual game makes their choice to dedicate time to a mini-game more relevant.
Take your meds and go back in your SS queue❤️.
1 Like
And you seem like you missed your calling as a psychologist, but alas here you are arguing about parses on a video game lmao
It’s always so funny when PvE Andys almost get the point but then it flies right over their heads. Too busy looking at parse logs and trying to invent extra complexity and mechanics in a game that barely cares about raiding in the first place.
Enjoy fated raiding in S4 bud, sounds like a lot of fun. I’m sure the official Blizzard race to world first will be great. Meanwhile I’ll catch you in Plunderstorm kek.
2 Likes
None of this meaningless gibberish you’re rage-typing changes the fact that I’m right, but I’m assuming that’s why you had nothing else to say in the first place 
It’s funny how a PvP player insulting recycled content doesn’t see the irony. PvP in this game has been recycled content for the better part of 15 years.
At any rate, this isn’t a thread about PvP vs PvE, take your angsty energy elsewhere or tell the parents you need a nap and a snack.
5 Likes
Why are you talking like you’re a top performer in PvP lol? Your ratings are trash in literally any real PvP game type. You win less than half your games in 3v3 and don’t play 2v2
I guess I’d be unhinged too if I based my identity on a game I had no idea how to play.
2 Likes
Loving all of the Ad Hominem in this thread. NOBODY can have an opinion on anything ever unless they’re the best ever at it forever.
You want more range? Well you should have thought about before you had a low parse! Really funny how you can’t want this without someone calling you bad at the game
/popcorn
4 Likes
You want more range? Well you should have thought about before you had a low parse! Really funny how you can’t want this without someone calling you bad at the game
Where’s my axe throwing fury warrior? Clearly, the problem is the game and not what I play.
These are definitely the same thing. A melee class wanting more range vs a ranged spec wanting equal range.
(I WOULD play an axe throwing warrior, because it would be sick)
5 Likes
But not all melee specs have the same range.
So what I read here is that you don’t 2v2 or 3v3, and you are talking about your past rankings in one of the most poorly balanced pvp xpacs on three of the most broken classes of the xpac.
Seems like you basically haven’t even played this expansion at all. No wonder your takes are as trash as your resume.
Heading back to WCL now, since apparently that’s a place that people hang out.