Why give players a choice instead of railroading them? I dunno, because class fantasy should still have a seat at the table instead of focusing solely on group content.
Are you seriously asking that question? Do you even know what they’re doing with MM?
That’s because I’m MM. not BM.
And I’ve offered solutions. You lot don’t care about solutions. You don’t care about the changes. All you are here to do is dump on people who care about the spec as it currently exists. That’s it. Just a bunch of hateful peanut gallery rejects who only pop up whenever Blizzard does something unpopular.
Ps,: even if there was only 1000 people who didn’t use lone wolf, they still deserve to not have their class fantasy ripped out from under them after 20 years.
Also, it’s really not that hard to understand very few people would be against these changes if we could still summon the pet when we want to, even if it disabled the eagle. But they were very clear we will not be able to use the pets at all anymore.
Pets serve a vital role while soloing and in PvP, and a lot of us are attached to pets we’ve had 20+ years we suddenly won’t have access to anymore.
Hunters are quite literally designed to take more damage because our pets take most of the damage. Yet they have not mentioned a single increase to marksman survivability to account for the loss of our pocket tank.
It seems like a lot of outrage because their gold fish is being removed.
How does that make mm a pet class then? If it has zero part of your actual play.
Make it make sense.
I like solutions. When they are actual solutions.
Not things that are going to further convolute specs.
And I absolutely care about these changes. For the first time in years, I’m actually excited to play mm. They changed A LOT more than just /removing the pet and adding mortal strikes.
Did you even read the patch notes?
But I guess it’s easier to call people shills when you get push back rofl. This isn’t your personal echo chamber.
Fixing Lone Wolf so you gain hero and pet utility without pet management, good
Getting rid of a open world and leveling tank option for MM, unacceptable
Getting rid of pet identity, a pet that players found, chose, and traveled with for years and replacing it with a generic bird? Completely unacceptable
Turning the “lone wolf” into “actually you have a permanent follower”, completely tone deaf
The only way this makes since is they are trying to clear the petless sniper fantasy deck for Tinker. Then they let the interns who are younger than some of the pets they are killing off come up with the world’s dumbest solution.
I don’t want an eagle. My gnome MM has a bumble bee named Honeybuns for a reason. It doesn’t matter if it’s a good reason and I shouldn’t have to change specs just to keep her.
How did they workshop all of these great QOL improvements and not say “let’s put these into Lone Wolf so we can have all these upsides without alienating every casual that plays Hunter?”
Let me use my pet, the same pet I’ve had for the past 17 years, and I’m fine with everything else.
Thats my point of contention. I want my pet, the very same pet I’ve had for the past 17 years. Having my pet, replaced with general EAgle #7 that won’t even show up unless its procced isn’t a pet. It’s just a murder of crows passive.
You mean like the 2 class tree abilities that require a pet to use? (One can be specced so it doesnt require a pet, but that costs marksman an extra talent point.) Or how about the 2 class tree abilities that also affect your pet?
How about the class tree passives that are pet specific such as:
Or how about the baseline skill that used to get a buff if you were using Lone Wolf, but now just straight up has the same heal even without a pet, despite the fact it also heals your pet for 100%?
How about the Play Dead skill which only works on with a pet: