How have I been using a pet as MM since Legion?
It also doesn’t mention traps or explosives, and MM uses those too.
6 Likes
Having the option to use a pet for the utility doesnt change the fact that its been designed at its core to not use a pet. Thats why the spec has zero interaction with pets outside of the pets utility.
Ok? traps and explosives arent mentioned in the other two either.
You are clearly desperate to try and make a point
SV explicitly mentioned explosives. And on that note, MM also uses venoms, which SV also mentions.
2 Likes
Ahh I did miss that. Its still irrelevant though.
Again irrelevant.
MM clearly doesnt mention pets when the other two do.
Besides the 8 times pets are referenced within the… Hunter Class Tree.
Almost like Hunters are supposed to have Pets.
Are they going to also completely redesign the entire hunter class tree too to fit the narrative that MM Hunters are “Petless”?
9 Likes
And again, it also doesn’t mention a bunch of other stuff that MM shares with the other specs that aren’t being removed.
3 Likes
You mean the general tab talking about class in general and not MM specifically?
Desperate much?
They should.
AGAIN its all irrelevant. The spec isnt designed around having pets.
Deal with it or dont
Players a change wont affect: “Har har! Get over it ‘Players a change will affect’. Blizzard knows best!”
Players another change now affect that previously didn’t: “WHAT?! How could this happen to me!”
1 Like
The tab that denotes what the Class is? The Primary Class Tab? The Tab that defines what a Hunter is for its BASE abilities? Sure am talking about that.
So, to fit the bill for the singular, minor node choice of Lone Wolf. You’re saying that Blizzard should 100% redesign the entire classes Trees, specs, Abilities, etc, just to fit the billet of “Lone Wolf”? - And you’re saying we’re the ones out of touch?
6 Likes
No, but the class is.
6 Likes
Is it though?
LW introduced in WoD. Blizzard then changes MM to be petless in Legion this lasts a patch, and they go back to LW as an option for MM. Than Blizzard buffs LW in BfA to make it the preferred choice, yet MM still keeps their pet. Even when the best option is LW MM will choose to keep using a pet.
Blizzard has tried to make MM a petless spec for years, but keep going back on the change.
8 Likes
Yeah instead of making rangers a separate class.
6 Likes
Im glad they are removing hunter pets. One less auto taunt in the game. Now we just need to get rid of it on BM.
The question is, why does Blizzard keep on reverting their stance?
If the population of players who want a petless spec over those who use their pet is so great, then why not keep the version from Legion?
5 Likes
Yes you are the ones out of touch. The general tab is talking about the class in general. Its not talking about each spec. You are nitpicking because you are that desperate for a point.
Two specs of the class are. The third spec is not.
Yes
to play as an archer, one of the most iconic play styles in fantasy???
1 Like
Acknowledging that the general tab sets up what the class is, and then immediately dismisses it because “But MM Spec”.
I’m done “conversing” with you. As this just seems to be your way of passing time by “trolling” this post.
Good day, and a Merry Christmas. 
3 Likes
You want to get rid of pets for bm? How about warriors lose all weapon and shield skills then. Its the same thing.
2 Likes
And what about the RP fantasy of players who just want to be an archer / rifleman, but get pressured by other players to pull a pet out for lust/hero?