Please don’t remove Hunter pets

Of course not. If that were important, this wouldn’t have just become an issue.

I spend 95% of my time outside of group content. That’s when I pull out my cat. I don’t even bother re-speccing out of LW most of the time because 5% doesn’t matter in Delves or other solo content.

1 Like

Yes, actually. You take Lone Wolf.
Ironic how you tried to tell me I am playing wrong just to expose your own mistakes.

If you need Leech to stay alive, you’re playing wrong to begin with.

1 Like

They should make a Ranger class with 2 or 3 distinct specs within it. It would be a second class that uses bows and guns. And also unshackled from pets. Then let Marksmanship play with pets like it’s been doing for 20 years. (unless you opted for Lone Wolf).

4 Likes

I agree.
I would love that.

So when is this happening? Never? At least 2 years from now…?
Ok then.

1 Like

I love the glass cannon type. You are so squishy and don’t care to help healers…your healing friends if you have them must love you…

1 Like

True who knows WHEN they could ever make a new class, but it would certainly solve a lot of contention between the two types of hunter/ranger player now wouldn’t it.

2 Likes

You literally just said you don’t give up your pet for damage so you can have more defensives.

What is going on?

1 Like

Most hunter lore character have no pet. What’s Alleria’s pet? Vereesa’s? Shandris’? Lor’themar’s? Halduron’s?

You are saying the same thing people said about melee Survival: “hunters are ranged!”, and yet Rexxar, one of the most iconic hunter characters, is melee. Don’t force your narrow concept of “hunter” onto everyone.

1 Like

If the requests were made to have this change potentially reverted off the Marksmen Hunter, and instead development started on a Ranger Class, It would 100% fit with the aesthetics of Midnight being centered around Silvermoon.

As they do have Rangers.

2 Likes

Sarcasm…rookie hunters take high damage over balance of things that keep you alive

1 Like

They aren’t hunters. They are literally called “Ranger” Generals. They are Hunter analogues by game mechanics.

2 Likes

Rangers are within the umbrella of the Hunter class. Guess who formed the Hunter hall in Legion?

1 Like

That’s because Hunter was the only analogue we had for a bow user in Legion. If they split the rangers and hunters up today, there’s no reason both bow/gun user classes couldn’t co-mingle still like in the class halls.

2 Likes

Thanks for confirming my entire argument.

1 Like

No, Hunter was envisioned to encompass rangers.

1 Like

We clearly need more ranged physical damage specs too. We only have one, and they’re trying to stuff 6 class fantasies into it

4 Likes

You’re a rookie hunter. Probably parsing greys in LFR.

1 Like

No it wasn’t. Hunters are a very Night Elf and Tauren derived class imo originally. Super into nature and the wilds, and animals and pets. Naturalists.

They have evolved to encompass rangers because Hunter is the only class even slightly similar.

2 Likes

Which 6?

Ranger, ranger, ranger, ranger, ranger, and ranger?

1 Like

Did I touch a nerve?..uhh BIG NUMBERS MOST IMPORTANT!!..uuhh…WORKING AS TEAM PLAYER BAD!!..

1 Like