Nothing to bite on. It’s an honest mistake. It happens to everyone.
I never said mplus and raiding are the only content that exist. I just said they are the most prioritized and the most played.
What fallacy, the data is public, you can go and check
If you are not using, nothing will change??? lol
no, i did on purpose because i knew you would be that kind of person to point out, especially when i said you were mad, its simple bait rly for you to shows your colors
you dont need to spell out things to mean then, especially by the condescending way you speak,
Which is half right and half wrong. they are most prioritized, true, but they are not the most played if you compare number of people doing it and the number of wow players.
1 Like
It’d be more appropriate to say it’s not a republic.
It is close to a democracy.
The major difference is that Blizzard is not obligated to act in the interest of the ‘votes.’ This is because it isn’t a government, more than because it’s not a specific type of one.
And let me tell you, democratic processes actually suck a lot. Upvote/downvote driven discussion is democratic. Forums tend to be more like a republic, where people get to iterate as peers or something close to it.
1 Like
Well considering I’m not mad at the slightest lol. I’m clearly living rent free in your head.
Probably shouldn’t claim I said things I didn’t then.
Where’s your numbers?
Because ion himself said the majority of the casual playerbase play all content at some degree by playing a little bit of each.
Even if you don’t believe what he says
End of the day this is a group based game first with the option to play solo. Group play is going to get the priority. This is clearly proven by the fact they are making these changes.
1 Like
Go see the number of people doing keys, and high level keys and the projection on wow sub numbers. Casuals doing dungeons doesn’t mean they will run keys above certain numbers. Can just mean they do normal, heroic or timewalking.
Even people doing raiding, they do LFR, not mythic, i think even ion said only 5% or 0.5% of the playerbase try mythic raids
And all these content dont require min-max, thus, they dont care about being optimal, so they would be fine with the option to have a pet in the pet class.
End of the day, they can make the changes and keep the pet as sub-optimal option just fine and the “elite” will not suffer one bit.
That is again, circular logic fallacy, but yeah, lets see if third time is the charm, because, again, they tried to remove pet twice, and failed
will they fail again? will they succeed? 
1 Like
That doesn’t prove anything. I specified that it’s at any level of content. Even in LFR the data shows the majority are running LW not a pet.
You’re reaching on zero factual data
They could. However they chose not too.
The previous times weren’t with a spec remake. I think third time will be the charm and nothing will change.
It proves this change is tailored to the small part of the community and will be rejected by the majority who don’t care about M+
Classic snozy
For now
Pretty sure Wod did make a remake coming from MOP, in most classes, it had pruning, abilities changed, were removed, others became pecific to certain specs and hunters got others
I even remember mastery changing in WoD as well, and that is what we got ever since, so you were wrong again, for the surprise of no one.
Lets see if for once you are right, cause as show above you more often end up wrong.
And your bets also never pay off, so i would not put my money on you, remember you say nothing would change about BM AOE and if people wanted AOE they should play MM until the next big patch? and they announced changes in BM aoe few days later? 
1 Like
It’s a strawman they will hammer away at to no end because they do not have an argument that actually holds water. Just “it should be my way because I want it”.
Players who have opted not to learn how to play the spec because they rely on the crutch of a pocket tank are throwing a tantrum. Anyone who has actually learned to use the toolkit knows that we already have enough abilities to kill anything without it.
In fact, the only place MM would actually need a pet is in higher solo delves, and as I have stated multiple times in that case they are going to be much more effective swapping to BM anyway.
So the only place the argument holds up, they are choosing to be less effective on purpose and want the game design to work around their whim.
Fortunately the devs are aware of this and have chosen not to cater to it.
The notion of “jUsT gIvE uS cHoiCe” is not one that flies with anyone who is competent in systems design. If users had the choice to do whatever they want the experience is worse for everyone.
1 Like
Hunter pets are amazing pocket tanks. They’re a lot stronger than you realize.
How much of Lone Wolf’s usage is due to it being numerically superior to pick in group content? How many are using it because they hate their pets? I bet those circles have some overlap, but not as much as Blizzard thinks they do.
2 Likes
To be very clear, that’s precisely what you’re doing. You’re telling us to shut up and accept the change you want.
Using all of the abilities available to your class makes you a bad player. This is utter garbage of an argument.
Swapping to another spec is not a solution. It is you being dismissive and condescending.
Utterly wrong and shows that you are not paying any attention to what is actually being said. We want pets to be completely optional. So those who want to play petless aren’t giving up anything. You, however, are against any compromise.
They’ve been “aware” of this multiple times before and it’s failed every time so far.
Nah. It’s fine to have choices. But I guess you’d be fine with them removing talent trees and abilities and giving you a single button that does damage because apparently anything that gives players choices is a bad thing.
I’ve proven to him before that raiders make up less than a third of the player base. And M+ numbers have been very low this expansion thanks to the squish. So they don’t make up nearly as much of the player base as they used to. But of course Snozay claims to have better numbers that he refuses to show because he also claims that he’s the only one capable of understanding those numbers.
4 Likes
It literally isnt’. Quit making crap up. Blizzard is the one deciding how it should be and I happen to agree with them.
People using the pet to tank are missing the point of the archer spec. You don’t need half the toolkit if you sit back and let the pet tank.
Swapping to a spec is a solution. I do it all the time.
Not wrong at all. Pets cannot be optional without causing the issues we have today. And thus they will be removed.
And yet they are still doing it again until they get it right. Unlike hunters who can’t handle not hiding behind fido, they are not quitters.
Nah, it’s not fine to have choices that are detrimental to the intended outcome. Yes, it is a bad thing.
The number of times “you” is in your reply is just laughable. Stop trying to make it about me it’s pathetic.
1 Like
I’m not making anything up. I’m stating exactly what you’re doing.
Using the pet that is provided to you is not missing the point of anything. You want an archer spec. The archer spec you want currently does not exist. So you are the one ignoring half your toolkit and pretending that makes you better.
I play MM because I like how MM works. Swapping to BM does not solve my problem at all. And you’d know that if you’d paid any attention instead of just jumping into these threads to spread nonsense.
They absolutely can be made optional. You’re just settling for mediocrity, so long as you get what you want, other people don’t matter to you.
Again, using your entire toolkit does not make a person a bad player. That’s just something you made up so you could pretend to be superior.
Then they should eliminate all choices that are suboptimal.
What’s pathetic is that you’re obsessed with the idea that I’m obsessed about you.
3 Likes
The spec is not an archer, is a marksman, not using it i missing the point of the hunter class.
the choice of having a pet is not detrimental to the spec nor the class.
3 Likes
Lol nope. I didn’t tell anyone to shut up. More lies.
I am not ignoring half the toolkit when the talent is literally to run without it. Try again.
You play MM on lazy mode in a way that will no longer exist. Good luck.
No, they can’t, they tried for a decade, it did not work. And they aren’t so it’s irrelevant.
Again trying to make it about me nonstop. It’s a lazy disingenuous method of “arguing”.
That’s all you do. That’s not a lie.
The spec has an optional talent that allows you to run without it. You try again when you can be more accurate.
This is you telling me to shut up.
They haven’t touched MM pets in a decade. They haven’t tried anything and now they’re all out of ideas.
I’m responding to you because you said something. Stop with these personal attacks because you don’t like how the forums work.
2 Likes
Quote me saying shut up. I’ll wait. Saying good luck is not remotely the same.
You said it, not me. But, yes, in general, telling people stuff like “good luck” or that they should just “switch specs” is equivalent to telling them to shut up because you’re not willing to listen to anything they say. You’ve made up your mind on this and you don’t want anyone else to have any say in this, so you just come in with all these dismissive and condescending attacks towards other players for daring to not be 100% for going petless.
“You you you”
Not responding to anything you have to say about me it’s pathetic.
Explain how I’m supposed to respond to you without using the pronoun “you”. I mean, you keep saying “you” to me, but that’s fine. Then I say “you” to you and you lose your mind. Seems a bit unhinged if you ask me.
1 Like