You still using murlok to try and make an argument? lol
Says the RBG shuffle hero lol
razer sponsorship
1 Like
You still using no data at all to make yours?
Says the one that can’t even get rating in them because it would require not getting carried (You can’t even say you didn’t try to get rating in shuffle, you tried and maxed out under 1800 which is really consistent for you.)
3 Likes
Also, never said I did not use it, all of my specs but my delve, which I DO NOT USE, have it.
The spec I use for world content? my M+ one, which has binding shot.
Not my fault if some, like he with the long schnozz, can’t do the comprehension of “this one spec of mine does not have it, others of mine do”
Never have but its ok. You keep thinking that top players logging out in a build without xyz means they never use it.
LOL still on with the carried bit huh?
Theres a reason no one takes you seriously.
I know you of all people arent talking about “comprehension”
There are probably more people that take me seriously than you, just by virtue of you being unable to have a conversation with most people without trying to put them down - which is how this all started.
6 Likes
Lol sure thing. Whatever you need to tell yourself.
I take you more seriously than Snoz,
because Snoz just impossible, period.
4 Likes
Yea lol. It’s a known thing that top players will sometimes log out with very meme things to try and gaslight theorycrafters and people that try and use that for build advice 
1 Like
Thats because you dont like taking multiple Ls like you normally do rofl and its easier to say you dont take me seriously.
This is another big fallacy of yours, because my “assumption” is backed up by MM being coded with the pet for the past 20 years
You afirming blizzard reasons being < because is too hard to do the changes and keep the pet > is compltely unfounded and have no grounds to stand on, since blizzard themselves said they just wanted to change their fantasy;
So there is nothing saying it is impossible to do it, or that is hard, and there is nothing that says blizzard did that
Thats pure designers fallacy 
they by this logic, they should have removed lone wolf and kept the pet.
It worked fine for ten years, and the only issue → putting the pet ability as a hunter ability, could have being done without removing the option to summon it
2 Likes
He also has a tendancy to double down when called out. I did say my delve spec does not have binding shot, but my M+ one does. My hunter actually has 4 saved loadouts:
Raid ST
Raid AoE/Cleave
M+
Delve
So 1/4 loadouts I have does not have binding shot? that is 25%, seems a bit low to claim “I never use binding shot”
2 Likes
Should probably read what I actually said
And even if they do, if one so desires, they can look at other load out the player has when looking at the profile.
And on that note, how is that much, if any, different then thinking " my x build does not have y ability" means I never use y ability? This is what Snozzy tried with me
(BTW: I have Snozay on ignore, as I tend to put all of his alts on due to his behavior here, so I onlysee what he types if someone quites him or I click on view hidden reply)
2 Likes
Check this,
simple trick to achieve complete comment domination.
LMAO ROFL, LOL SNOZ, LMAO.
See, instant W.
I just got forum achieve “Instant Defeat Snoz”.
4 Likes
Denial at its best.
If it makes you feel better no one takes you seriously at all.
You confirm you have no idea what you’re talking about.
How do you know that?
Based on the amount of likes under my comments, you are lying again.
Yawn.
4 Likes
There isn’t much more to be said. It’s mostly people arguing in circle. More will speak up during PTR and if they launch it like that then expect a bunch of people coming to the forums to complain.
7 Likes
I second this
The people liking your posts are just as clueless as you are. That’s not saying much rofl.