anything relevant to add, 68 posts?
So youâre admitting that you know the difference between automation and replication, but you donât care, and you want Blizzard to change their stance?
Youâre arguing in a dishonest manner then.
Yes it is identicle, maybe that is why Acti / Blizz doesnât have any issue with multi-boxing. Especially when people try to muddy the waters up by trying to say there is some huge significant difference in game results if itâs five people playing five toons or 1 player playing five toons.
There may be some differeneces, but there are always going to be differences because not every situation is the same.
That would be like saying a five meme spec team should be able to do 5 non meme spec content and saying, âWell they are five players, so there should be no reason why they canât.â Itâs just silly to think that they could.
Ive seen it before. Itâll take me a few to make the connectionâŚbut Iâll figure it out.
I remember seeing that first page.
Let me explain why Activision Blizzard really doesnât have a problem with it: $$$$$$$$
This reads exactly like an advertisement using negative publicity to generate clicks. Gross.
I agree with the message though.
Even if that is the case, they are a business that is all about making money, the are not a charity site last time I looked into it.
Assuming itâs about the money though, why are they going on bot banning sprees though?
Itâs a problem when all these gold are selling in facebook exchanger groups instead of tokens.
Imagine using failsbook in 2020.
Let me explain why Activision Blizzard really doesnât have a problem with it: $$$$$$$$
If people want to bring up the money aspect of Acti / Blizz
I ask them to join me in a crusade of sorts.
This crusade is to done a single task.
Fight so that if people use the AH, they MUST sell for vendor value and not a copper more.
Imagine using failsbook in 2020.
I havenât used that thing much in the last 5 years.
That place is just a toxic mess I try to avoid at all costs.
I donât see how this is not automating gameplay.
Does a player press each key for each action? Well then there you go.
Also, why donât you link for the thread how long ISBoxer has been around (and thus Blizzard has known about it). (hint: https://isboxer.com/wiki/FAQ
)
Youâre arguing in a dishonest manner then.
Itâs not.
Iâm not arguing that automation is bad, thatâs a given.
Iâm saying that any program that replicates, duplicates, automates, clones, any synonym of any word that describes the actions of a program that allows you to instantly interact w/ multiple instances of the game client should not be allowed.
You want to multibox? Click into each separate window and interact w/ each separate ability.
Thatâs all my argument is. Being able to interact w/ the game on 5+ characters instantly is what bothers me, itâs what I consider P2W, itâs the only gripe I have w/ multiboxers.
The basis of automation (for Blizzard) requires two factors:. 1) A player must make a keypress that causes one action in one instance of WoW, 2) The player must be present at the keyboard to make that keypress.
Boxing software like ISboxer does not break either of those rules.
I can agree that boxing can be abused by some playerâs, but that is no reason to condemn the entire playstyle.
replicates, duplicates, automates, clones
One of these things is not like the others, one of these things ainât even the sameâŚ
Go learn some definitions please, otherwise, youâre arguing from ignorance.
One of these things is not like the others, one of these things ainât even the sameâŚ
Go learn some definitions please, otherwise, youâre arguing from ignorance.
Jesus god no Iâm not. Youâve literally seen that I know the difference between the two, Iâm merely mixing the terms to cover all my bases when it comes to MB software.
Each and every person here crying in defense of Multiboxing gets more hung up on that word while ignoring literally everything else.
âItâs not automationâ is a dishonest argument if you continue to willfully ignore every other point made against multiboxing software.
Being able to interact w/ the game on 5+ characters instantly is what bothers me, itâs what I consider P2W, itâs the only gripe I have w/ multiboxers.
I do not care if itâs automation or not and it doesnât change my opinion if Blizzard considers it automation or not.
Youâve literally seen that I know the difference between the two
replicates, duplicates, automates, clones
This, right here? Proves that you donât know the difference.
Iâm merely mixing the terms to cover all my bases when it comes to MB software.
Oh wait, you DO know the difference. So youâre being dishonest then like I said before.
âItâs not automationâ is a dishonest argument
It isnât. Equating âreplication, duplication, and cloningâ with âautomationâ (please look up ALL of those definitions before you respond) is a dishonest argument because one of those things is NOT like the others. AT ALL. And thatâs where YOUR argument fails horribly.
Edit: Also, Iâm done here, because youâre determined to go around in circles.
Youâre wrong, Blizz says youâre wrong, and thatâs the end of the argument. Period.
Being able to interact w/ the game on 5+ characters instantly is what bothers me, itâs what I consider P2W, itâs the only gripe I have w/ multiboxers.
This. This is the part you seem to have trouble reading.
Frankly you can do a regedit for the exact same effect, thereby skipping all of this pedantic nonsense, and I would still consider it bad for the game.
multi botting is still botting regardless of what anyone says.
Thatâs fine op. Folks will just start using KVM switches you can buy off Amazon, and Bestbuy, or any place that sells computer stuff. And that is all key copy software is just a kvm switch that is software not hardware. What are you people that constantly whine about something folks have been doing since 2004 going to do then? Start protesting places like Walmart, Bestbuy, Newegg, etc, etc, because they sell switches that do the same thing as the software You guys are almost as whiny as the LFR spammers.