Please ban Key Repeaters like ISBoxer for Mulitboxing

[Mafic-emerald-dream (Mafic)]

This has always fallen within a grey area with BlizZard. Even Swifty has discussed this with his viewers.

[Yasudra-malorne (Yasudra)]

@Akäraven-barthilas

It most certainly is already in the EULA about using software to automate any function of play.

https://www.blizzard.com/en-sg/legal/fba4d00f-c7e4-4883-b8b9-1b4500a402ea/blizzard-end-user-license-agreement

2. bots; i.e. any code and/or software, not expressly authorized by Blizzard, that allows the automated control of a Game, or any other feature of the Platform, e.g. the automated control of a character in a Game;

Bolded a key point.

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Aevelamue-dalaran

seems accurate to me lol scrum definition

an ordered formation of players, used to restart play, in which the forwards of a team form up with arms interlocked and heads down, and push forward against a similar group from the opposing side

I guess Im supposed to buy that this gent actually MEANT it as a rugby term and not the four letter word they have used 1000 times in here that just happens to be the same word minus on letter.

I dont.
He’s basically doing the same thing as those who swap letters to get around the word censor.
I know it. You know it. He knows it. We ALL know it.

His clear tone here is using the word in a derogatory, insulting manner.

@Wuhanbat-area-52

ban multi boxer scrum, no better than bots

@Wuhanbat-area-52

lol someone tried to report my posts about banning Multiboxers and they got restored, even Blizzard knows multiboxers are scrum

@Wuhanbat-area-52

Better than feeling like multiboxers who know they’re scrum

I read what ‘scrum’ is…its a tactic…not an insult.

[Pyri-shadowsong]

@Firi-skullcrusher

I think Acti / Blizz would ban multi-boxing if someone could create a good enough argument.

Okay, if you believe that’s a good use of your time and energy, go for it. Good luck finding something that hasn’t already been brought up and dismissed repeatedly over the last 15+ years.

[Akäraven-barthilas]

So point out to me where in recent times Blizzard have expressly authorised any software from being used, specifically ISBoxer. You can’t, and you know why? They don’t do that. Blizzard don’t have a list of software they authorise being used, not at least one they will ever list publicly.

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Wuhanbat-area-52

Says the one crying about people who don’t like multiboxers, typical scrum

Im sure you THINK this is a good way to make moderation believe youre not saying what we ALL know youre saying.
probably should stop acting juvenile and just make your topic relevant points.

@Wuhanbat-area-52

scum isn’t a censored word, nice try though scrum.

Not really good with getting points figured out, are we ?

@Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak

He’s basically doing the same thing as those who swap letters to get around the word censor.
I know it. You know it. He knows it. We ALL know it.

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Akäraven-barthilas

So point out to me where in recent times Blizzard have expressly authorised any software from being used, specifically ISBoxer. You can’t, and you know why? They don’t do that. Blizzard don’t have a list of software they authorise being used, not at least one they will ever list publicly.

yeah?
Not even a good try.
That is talking about AUTOMATED play…which bliz clearly DOESNT define merely boxing AS ‘automated’.

that allows the automated control of a Game, or any other feature of the Platform, e.g. the automated control of a character in a Game;

apples and oranges.

Is it sending an identical signal to all client windows or switching between them to send commands? Not automation.
Is it playing the game for you, or rather, for one of your client windows? Automation.

Multiboxing, or playing multiple World of Warcraft accounts at once, is not a violation of our Terms of Use.

That first one is from 2008.
You were told THEN that its not automation.
Guess it takes a couple decades for it to sink in with some sorts.

[Omgitskevin-tichondrius]

Lol you made this thread cause I called you a Karen when you lied and told me that blizz changed their tos and you were going to report me. And I just lol at you and told you go ahead and report and waste your time.

[Firi-skullcrusher]

Why would I try and convince Acti / Blizz to ban Multi-boxxing when I support multi-boxxing and also multi-box?

That would be a bit odd, don’t you think?

[Ravenhawk-blackwater-raiders]

@Wuhanbat-area-52

nice try though scrum.

You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means

[Wuhanbat-area-52]

You don’t like rugby?

[Ravenhawk-blackwater-raiders]

You don’t even know what rugby is…

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Wuhanbat-area-52

You’re right I don’t because I’m not a cheater, typical cheater defender scrum keep false flagging

but you are a liar. Youve been shown 1000 times that boxing ISNT cheating yet your lies that it is persist. What does it say about a person who knowingly and willingly lies to push their personal agenda?

[Aevelamue-dalaran (Aevelamue)]

@Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak

Boxing is here to stay

i just want you boxxers to have your own servers

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Firi-skullcrusher

So if multi-boxers are cheaters and are breaking the rules. Why is Acti / Blizz taking action against actual rule breakers and not multi-boxers in general?

Good question.
So theyre saying that bliz devs are too stupid to know what the rules are…or too stupid to enforce them…or maybe even intentionally enabling cheating themselves by ignoring boxers.
I doubt any of those are true.

@Firi-skullcrusher

I love Ben Shapiro and his famous quote, “Facts, don’t care about your feelings.”

Ben is a pretty smart guy. The wife loves watching his videos. pretty funny watching him shred the emotionalism with cold hard logic.

[Rahkeetahp-aerie-peak]

@Aevelamue-dalaran

i just want you boxxers to have your own servers

Not going to happen.
99.999% of the playerbase who DOESNT box ISNT screaming about it, but are out there playing along side the boxers.
Bliz aint going to partition off boxers over the flailing and tantrums of 0.0001% of the base whining about it.
I doubt thats even enough incentive for them to even set aside a single non boxing server for you all, honestly.

[Firi-skullcrusher]

I just don’t think there is a big enough multi-boxxing community for Acti / Blizz to even humor the idea.

It really does remind me of the threads when you see people run to the forums when they get ganked in PVP or some other thing of that nature.

Someone runs to the forum and all of a sudden by reading the thread you would think it’s happening all the time and the “issue” is an earth shattering 500 cases happening at least every 10 minutes.

[Ravenhawk-blackwater-raiders]

Considering they are connecting less populated servers, adding a new server type for a small niche group would not be feasible, a waste of time and resources.

[Kaurmine-area-52]

Another problem with this is one of the things that keeps Blizz from merging servers, player names. Some people are quite attached to their names and trying to yeet them to a multiboxer server where the name is taken isn’t going to end well. Multiboxer shards would work better is player in group?are all characters in group on same account?yeet to multiboxer shard but the problem with that is families who have accounts under the same BNet.

[Ravenhawk-blackwater-raiders]

@Kaurmine-area-52

but the problem with that is families who have accounts under the same BNet.

That’s part of the issue, Blizz has even stated that the systems in place cannot differentiate between a multiboxer or a family(for example) playing from the same IP. It just sees that there are 5 or so accounts coming from that address.