Holy jeez. Is this a joke or are you actually this mentally unhinged?
You donât get to tell me how I perceive my character in reference to the forums. No more than I can tell you how you perceive it.
Yeah bro you sure showed me, claiming itâs only a game while acting smugly superior on a videogame forum of all places.
Youâre clearly more invested in this than you think you and itâs sad that you wonât just go ahead and admit it.
I have not told you that either, you are trying to change the discussion like you did earlier with mentioning me being a DK.
I gotta say, Iâm not interested in being off-topic with whataboutims here for the moment.
Youâre the one trying to call me a child murderer.
No Iâve been calling you an apologist.
See THIS is a quote actually worth discussing! So ⊠âwhatâs really exciting is watching when people do find out ⊠Even if its something really negative for youâŠâ Could we REALLY get the Sylvie Ogmotâs Shepherd betrayal? That doesnât even dive into the rest of it that suggests ⊠a âconclusionâ to her character; even if its not a conclusion we will see in THIS expansion. InterestingâŠ
I canât wait to see whatever dumb reason they try to sell as something worth betraying her over, as if thereâs anything that makes licking Alliance boots even remotely worth it.
So much better.
About as good as you telling me Iâm intellectually inferior over and over again.
It is. She does an excellent job giving us something without actually telling us what it is. What it does seem to imply is that itâs going to be exciting, but it wont please everyone. And really it is a statistical impossibility to please everyone, no matter what is done.
I donât think that returning Derek to Jaina was treason, but I do agree with this post. Derek was made violating every tenet of Forsaken cultural belief; the only correct thing to do â even by Forsaken standards â was return Derek.
But the stuff with Cataclysm I will never forgive.
But she had PLENTY of time to break him, but didnât. Just like she had plenty of opportunity to kill Baine but didnât.
Something else is going on, what it is I do not know. Is it good, is it bad. Does she want to kll her enemy and those she perceives as a traitor in one fell swoop, or did she use them to get Stormwindâs armies out of the city so it was going to be unguarded.
I donât know.
But I REALLY want to see what happens next.
Youâre literally arguing with bad faith to try and justify your weird position.
He knowingly disrupted Horde efforts and killed members of the Horde for the direct and intended benefit of an enemy leader.
It was treason.
If it was such a horrible thing for Forsaken values, maybe the Forsaken themselves would have cared more about it than Baine and some fresh corpse who hadnât even thrown Blight on an orphanage yet.
But thankfully it seems that none of the Forsaken cared much for the will of a tool like Derek. Hopefully we get even farther and farther away from the whole free will shtick.
Thatâs the weird thing with the story forum. They impose their beliefs over something and assume thatâs the default position.
Look at how many people talk about how Sylvanas killed the Horde at Lordaeron when the reality was them all apologizing for being out of position or how many people seem to think the Forsaken were upset about Derek.
Wasnât even about that but calling the irony, which it still is to be honest.
Like I said though, you can pretend to act slick all you want when you say âitâs just a gameâ but you flying off with insults over it sounds like what youâre really doing is projecting and the whataboutism has more than worn out its welcome with me as well
âYOUâRE A BAD PERSONâ only carries your argument so long before it becomes tired.
But itâs not wrong with the way youâve carried yourself this entire thread.
The Forsaken aided and abedded in the mass murder, mass damnation, and mass permanent enslavement of at least three Horde races.
Any Forsaken who was okay with what happened to Derek wasnât Horde.