People with losing arguments often look for ways to avoid the debate. All that does is make them look foolish. So go for it. Itâs not like I want to talk to you. I just use you as a stooge to keep the rdf issue on the front page.
1 Like
So you have no rebuttal or other supporting information to your stance and are deflecting with sarcasm.
Just as an anecdote to your absurdist statement. Legit saw a Clash of Clans group meet up irl in a bar last week. Sounds pretty social to me. Sounds like you havenât even looked into mobile gaming communities, at minimum PokĂ©mon go makes your attempt at a dig hold zero weight.
So group making should be hard in your mind because that will bring people together? Why would people wanting their time respected make grouping harder? Currently we have grouping where player time is not respected lots have just disconnected from the LFG entirely unless they have to use it. This is echoâd by the majority of my guild and those we play with outside of our guild. RDF respects time, LFG does not.
Falling back on slippery slope arguments. Just in the case of those who post in favor of RDF they voice not wanting LFR. They are tools that had drastically different results on the game and the effect LFR had is considered much worse by many. RDF did not have this effect of killing guilds or causing an entire reformat of raiding difficulties.
You type a lot but say very little. Ill engage with others who want to have honest discussions, go ahead and have the last word if you want, Iâm sure it will be informative and enlightening.
Itâs not sarcasm in any way. More players doesnât mean more social. Whenever you break a certain point you just become a number. You can be social in any games, but that doesnât mean that games shouldnât be designed to encourage some social aspects.
Because in some cases the world and the community has a higher priority than the individuals. I know it seems strange nowadays to think that way 
Moreover, what top guilds want should never be echoed much. Top players will never be happy unless you totally destroy the game just for them.
It has a direct link, the slippery slope fallacy is only true if thereâs no causality. But we got one as we have the same game and historically itâs how it happened. We should learn from past mistakes.
Iâm sure you can have a more enlightning discussion in an echo chamber. Itâs totally fine if we disagree and I have said what I have to say. All you can do is disagree as you donât share the same ideals. And thatâs fine.
And forcing players to waste hours looking for a group or whisper player after player doesnât mean more social. Walmarts doesnât seem more social to me when thereâs a greeter that says âwelcome to walmartâ. Itâs the same experience when thereâs no greeter at the door. Groups donât become more social if you whisper 20 people asking them to heal or tank for you.
2 Likes
Just flag his immaturity as spam, since spamming unrelated GIFâs does fit that description.
Theyâre totally related but you might be âmissing the pointâ like him.
All you want is an echo chamber, and Iâm not willing to give you it.
So you can accept that and move on.
Or the best, you could ignore me and make my day.
Iâll just ignore it. It bumps the thread and it loses him credibility because itâs a stupid thing to do. And he wonât be able to keep it up. Itâs really hard to be a petty azhat over the long term. It takes more work than most people are willing to do.
Or like an idiot he could put a gif after your posts. Donât you think thatâs the best thing to do?
1 Like
âIâm going to enter a thread intentionally just to be malicious then act the victim when I am called out for doing so by throwing a tantrum.â
Thereâs a reason these threads devolve and for the most part it isnât the pro-RDF people causing it.
Oh he probably can and thatâs the sad part.
2 Likes
When the only person agreeing with you is Red, you know you have a bad take.
L thread
3 Likes
Exactly lmfao.
2 Likes
Thatâs a good one if you really believe that.
It always devolves because pro-rdf people just canât imagine people disagreeing with them.
Iâve said many time that I think RDF should be in the game at this point but even that is not enough. They want everyone to think the same way.
Itâs all irrelevant as blizzard has already admitted to the damage that not having rdf has caused.
We already know rdf is on the way and itâs because itâs better for the game.
2 Likes
Pretty sure it was worded way differently than that.
âsoon tmâ doesnât mean much. But sure itâs âcomingâ.
Itâs pretty telling how the remaining rabid anti-RDF have boiled down to two people. Everyone else is either passively against, doesnât really care either way, or is pro-RDF. Hell even Zalg, who was the most rabid pro-RDF person has stopped as far as I can tell. Overall itâs quieted down a lot on both sides.
Even then Zipzo or whatever their name was could at least hold an honest discourse.
Really sad when an otherwise peaceful and decent discourse is ruined by people choosing to be malicious then being defensive about being called out for their bad acting.
Every time I see you post I am reminded of your hunter and their adventures lmao.
Iâve been seeing this pop up, is there a link to an interview I missed?
1 Like
I have a balanced opinion. I believe thereâs pros and cons.
And I think both sides should be considered.
I think itâs more malicious to try to bully people with personal attacks or dog pilling. Thatâs why most people that disagree with RDF donât want to engage much as there is a lack of moderation imo on the classic forums for this kind of thing.
The latest community council interview
2 Likes