Wasn’t really since we know its a troll post doesn’t mean we can’t have fun with it.
1 Like
Speak for yourself, I love flying.
2 Likes
Not true. The biggest complaints are pathfinder, RNG on top of RNG, Stupid rep grinds for fun content etc etc and so on.
Its not about content its about GOOD and FUN content. Rep grinds and dailies arent fun.
6 Likes
For who? What is and isn’t content is different for everyone. I’m a full time collector, I don’t do anything more “difficult” in current content than heroic dungeons and I ONLY do that on two occasions 1. The dungeon has a WQ that offers an appearance I don’t have collected 2. The dungeon has a WQ that is in an emissary zone and all the other WQs suck to me.
It’s all subjective. Different people like and enjoy different parts of this game. There is no right or wrong.
Just because some don’t like an aspect of the game, that’s ok. It’s their way of playing. There’s also folks like what others don’t.
It would be boring to me if there was just one play to play this game. That’s just me. 
H
Everyone loves flying. So much so that even the developer of Minecraft, Mojang, added a way to fly in survival Minecraft, and it added a whole new world of possibilities for builders and is the best way to explore. Horses used to be the best way to travel in Minecraft, now they’re like bugged or something.
1 Like
Lack of content? I thought the largest complaints were
- Pathfinder
- RNG
- Reputation
3 Likes
While games like ESO dont even have flight and you never miss it because of the MASSIVE portal system it has.
1 Like
This is funny. Before I Pathfinder 2 came flying was the biggest issue out there. I leave for Classic and totally ignore this forum. Come back a ten months later to find a bunch of folks complaining flying exists. It’s like this is where the Russians come to cut their teeth and train to see if they have the chops to be a Political Social Media troll. Too funny
1 Like
The problem with flying is the lack of hazards. The kaliri birds in Outland along with the cannons in Ogri’la provided hazards in those areas. They can be dodged but if allowed to hit could easily dismount you and did significant damage regardless. That should be the case everywhere.
Look at it this way … that would be adding content to the game. Faster travel but more likely to die than on the ground. Get more paths and make ground travel safe but slow and air travel fast but dangerous. Let the player decide their fate.
Who is this “nobody” and why should he dictate what mode of travel everyone gets to enjoy?
4 Likes
Quantity of content does not change as a function of you liking it or not.
1L of soy sauce will be 1L of soy sauce, whether you like it or not.
A diner table with pepper, garlic and wasabi will be a table with pepper, garlic and wasabi, however you like to spice your food.
A game with 10 things is a game with 10 things whether you do them or not.
However you like to make things about what one wants or likes, that does not make the World so.
I’m not sure what you’re saying. You claim GW2 has more content than wow, anything that can be collected in wow is content to me, even the stuff I don’t do right now. I don’t raid BFA mythic but once it becomes legacy I’ll be in those raids collecting xmog 
My goal in wow is to collect every xmog appearance/toy/pet/mount/recipe for each profession/and do every quest. It is a mountain of work so it is difficult for me to believe that GW2 has more content than wow.
Edit: Forgot all the titles and reputations too 
So lets try saying it again.
It does not matter what one (anyone, you, me, them) wants. The content does not change as a function of what one does, but what is available to do.
GW2 has xmog, has dungeons, has raids, has events, lots of instances, minigames, jumping puzzles, timed events, cascading events, world bosses, exploration is actually rewarded, it has pvp, it has arenas, it has bgs, in short, it has everything that WoW has in one form or another, and more.
GW2 had world quests and World timed events before wow had them.
GW2 has exploration based minigames, events and progression.
GW2 has region wide unlockable outposts and events.
And some other things minor, but still, more content.
GW2 has a “World wide PvP” composed of multiple regions in multiple “Worlds”, that WoW never had, and according to Blizzard, never will.
Amazingly bad at making me hate it.
1 Like
So the question becomes. Does GW2 have more than wow? Can you prove this? Is there a wowhead for GW2? It’d be fairly simple to prove from the wow side just go to wowhead and look and see how many different xmoggable items there are and then compare that to how many GW2 has. But I don’t know anything about GW2
You just making it about “prove to me”.
I dont need to prove anything to you.
It is knowledge available in the Internet. If you want to check it out, by all means, if not, it is your choice.
I know it to be true, and what you think about it does not matter to me.
Ok then I’ll take the stance that WoW has more than GW2 since no one has to prove anything lol.
1 Like
Gotta love that content of running around on the ground, through mobs you can literally ignore 100 of, to get to the WQ and then 2 shot the WQ mob. Great content _b.
Scaling is out of control this xpac. When it’s possible to solo world bosses in CURRENT content (e.g the 8.3 patch ones), you know they’ve screwed up.
Nobody wants another post about flying.
FIFY.
2 Likes