I mean who cares what he says. If my 5 year old niece tell me not to go in the closet because there’s a monster in the closet that won’t make a monster materialize 
And if he’s right so what? I’ll find out when I get banned lol
Reading must not be your strong suit. 
My god you’re insufferable. Dear lord.
Multicaster, not KVM
The issue here is you are not grasping the actual defition of Multiboxxing and what the community calls multiboxxing.
Which are different things.
1 Like
They could have done that and didn’t. They said it’s fine. You can wish upon a star all you want but boxing isn’t against the rules.
A Multicaster is a KVM.
1 Like
KVM is just an abbreviation for devices that allow the use of a single KB/Mouse/Video source on more than one PC.
1 Like
You’re honestly arguing about a fictional definition that I had initially established, and then said that I was wrong about what I had said? I’m so embarrassed for you.
Obvious troll is obvious.
Multiboxing is playing more than one account at the same time. It doesn’t say 2 or 500 accounts or any kind of way to use specific actions to make spells go off. Anything the “community” that doesn’t even box says isn’t the standard definition just because you decided it is.
Okie dokie smokie
You’re trying to argue that people who have a toon on follow should get banned. And I’m the troll. Okay dude. Lol
Yes, we’re all well aware of that. Have a good night. Hopefully you can find something better to do with your life than troll the wow forums.
Your correct.
Multiboxing means having more than one account running at the same time.
When the community says “Multiboxxing is banned”
They mean the guy that has 40 druids that run via one mouse, and when the user presses the starfall Key, they all cast Starfall at the same time.
Blizzard said the former is okay. The later is not.
2 Likes
I feel the need to point out something… they specified “and automated gameplay” which implies that blizzard makes a distinction between bots and automation… the reason I point this out though, is any time someone made mention that using input duplication software to simultaneously control multiple accounts was a form of automation, many were quick to claim that it’s not and always jumped to the assumption that anyone saying automation meant botting… automation can exist with a human input… if one input triggers multiple simultaneous outputs, then that is automation. Them noticing automation separate from botting also implies that botting isn’t the only intended target of the change. They have likely noticed the negative impacts of mass-multiboxing enabled through automation via input broadcasting software, and the scope of their aim may very well be intentionally impacting multiboxers to impose restrictions.
Blizzard has shown multiple times in the past that they are afraid to make hard decisions that will impact a sizable portion of the community. Instead of biting the bullet and making those decisions they will attempt to side step the issue in a way they hope will get the job done with as little conflict as possible… or atleast make a later transition easier… we might see mother policy update a little ways down the road that solidifies some hard restrictions on multiboxing, such as a maximum number of simultaneously active accounts…
They didn’t say that 
You’re the one trolling and saying I am won’t change it. You won’t even argue and actual point and then call troll when I spanked you with logic. Lmbo
They did say that.
You just want that to not be the case.
2 Likes
It wasn’t according to Blizzard, now it is
Look its plain and simple english, the support article clearly says Input Broadcasting Software.
If the intent was to include hardware it would of clearly stated hardware. I don’t see the point in trying to read between the lines, or decipher the “meaning” of it.
It is clear plain unambiguous english.