Not the way it works I’m afraid, at all.
We look into reports. A name either is - or is not, in violation. By the way, this one most certainly is.
You are free to appeal the decision, but as already pointed out above, that isn’t what an appeal is for. It isn’t a discussion, it isn’t to present your side - it is for us to review the original decision to decide if policy was followed. That is all it is.
You seem to think 18 seconds is a short amount of time, it probably wouldn’t have taken me 1.5 sec to agree with the report - this name is not appropriate. “Cut and paste” responses are otherwise known as templates. This is quite a common issue for GMs to deal with, it would definitely not be efficient to specifically handcraft an original piece of correspondence just for you. Even if that wasn’t an issue - how many ways can you say - nope, violates our rules, sorry you need a new name?