First you admit it. When that fails you deny it. It’s all just a succession of lies and distortions with you.
It’s a pay to win playstyle. Many multiboxers are honest enough to admit it. Most are not, likely because they know popular opinion is against pay to win strategies. You’ll find people on this forum advocating a blizzard store in classic too. Where you can buy gold and boosted characters just like you can in retail. I’m against pay to win strategies. You clearly like at least some of them. That’s where we can agree to disagree. I just wish the multiboxers would admit they’re paying to buy an easier game and to buy an advantage over those who choose not to pay that extra money every month.
Have fun multiboxing when you return! It is an excellent playstyle, super fun! What server are you on? We have several multiboxers on Benediction-PVP, on both sides, and they all are great assets to the community.
If someone wants to key clone fine. I have zero problem with that. Dual boxing/reasonable multi-boxing doesn’t make people as upset because there is easy counterplay.
When alliance raids cant get into Bwl with buffs for weeks because multi boxers with 15-40 accounts per player (this is 100% a real and regular thing) are standing outside using multibox software to wipe 40 person raids in seconds… that’s when people start to get irritated.
Kill the software, this isnt possible and Blizz loses relatively little money. Seems like a super obvious solution
So let’s review the discussion points from the never boxers:
We’ve discussed Pay-To-Win and found that there is no difference in terms of the amount paid when multiboxing compared to the same size group of players.
We’ve discussed PvP in that 5 players have an advantage over 1 person just like a multiboxer would have an advantage as well. So there is no issue here.
We’ve discussed forming the group and found that a multiboxer has quite a bit to set up before making the group. First the group composition must be decided and this is usually in the form of an agreement with other multiboxers on class make-up. Then the goals set for either PvP or PvE. Then the team must be tested and executed in order to attempt the challenge of multiboxing as it requires quite a bit more involved over a single character controlled by one person.
There has not been presented any valid reason for why multiboxing should not be allowed. The reason is because there isn’t a valid reason for prohibiting multiboxing. It should be allowed! Therefore the gaming company allows it.
Thank you Tim for providing us the discussion of positive asset for WoW Classic!
We’ve discussed Pay-To-Win and found that there is no difference in terms of the amount paid when multiboxing compared to the same size group of players.
We’ve discussed PvP in that 5 players have an advantage over 1 person just like a multiboxer would have an advantage as well. So there is no issue here.
We’ve discussed forming the group and found that a multiboxer has quite a bit to set up before making the group. First the group composition must be decided and this is usually in the form of an agreement with other multiboxers on class make-up. Then the goals set for either PvP or PvE. Then the team must be tested and executed in order to attempt the challenge of multiboxing as it requires quite a bit more involved over a single character controlled by one person.
There has not been presented any valid reason for why multiboxing should not be allowed. The reason is because there isn’t a valid reason for prohibiting multiboxing. It should be allowed! Therefore the gaming company allows it.
sad and pathetic. you act like you want to debate but you instead just shut your ears and pretend youre right. youre imposing your opinion without considering facts and evidence presented by the other side and you refuse to take the side of logic and reason. you front your case which is logically inconsistent and expect everyone to just accept it as factual.
Indeed incoming the insults from the never boxers because they were proven to be wrong. The game company allows it. It’s been presented and proven why it’s allowed.
youve never proven me wrong on anything. youre acting like youre right about arguments ive repeatedly proven you wrong about and posting to have the last word and put up this front like you’ve won the argument. its sad and pathetic and really i expect more from you
Once again please see below for the proof:
We’ve discussed Pay-To-Win and found that there is no difference in terms of the amount paid when multiboxing compared to the same size group of players.
We’ve discussed PvP in that 5 players have an advantage over 1 person just like a multiboxer would have an advantage as well. So there is no issue here.
We’ve discussed forming the group and found that a multiboxer has quite a bit to set up before making the group. First the group composition must be decided and this is usually in the form of an agreement with other multiboxers on class make-up. Then the goals set for either PvP or PvE. Then the team must be tested and executed in order to attempt the challenge of multiboxing as it requires quite a bit more involved over a single character controlled by one person.
There has not been presented any valid reason for why multiboxing should not be allowed. The reason is because there isn’t a valid reason for prohibiting multiboxing. It should be allowed! Therefore the gaming company allows it.
It’s not a question of winning the argument. It’s a question of learning. Hopefully you’ve learned something from this discussion. If you haven’t learned why multiboxing is allowed then I can’t help you I’m sorry. I will continue to try however.
same size group of players? ok.
one player pays $75
one player pays $15
different amount paid per player
right, but youre intentionally ignoring the glaringly important point that a multiboxer is not 5 players, they are one player playing 5 characters. this is an important distinction because the relative power level for one player is higher than the relative power level of another player, and the only way to match that power level are if the players playing one character each are grouped up
these are all nothing points that carry no weight in this conversation other than banter to distract from the main point that its an unfair pay to win system.
you refuse to acknowledge any point i make and as such lose any credibility or respect from myself
Then you proceed to compare different sized groups. If you want proof, do the comparison to what is actually clearing dungeons.
Once again as we’ve already discussed:
We’ve discussed Pay-To-Win and found that there is no difference in terms of the amount paid when multiboxing compared to the same size group of players.
We’ve discussed PvP in that 5 players have an advantage over 1 person just like a multiboxer would have an advantage as well. So there is no issue here.
We’ve discussed forming the group and found that a multiboxer has quite a bit to set up before making the group. First the group composition must be decided and this is usually in the form of an agreement with other multiboxers on class make-up. Then the goals set for either PvP or PvE. Then the team must be tested and executed in order to attempt the challenge of multiboxing as it requires quite a bit more involved over a single character controlled by one person.