More money can turn a blind eye in many companies. I am surprised to see blizzard admit it being controversial and undesirable to the wow community though.
By who? You?
Having a couple random pieces of 475 gear won’t suddenly give you 100k+ DPS and make you an unstoppable force of nature the way Poize thinks it will.
You didn’t answer my question. Who debunked it? You?
Rationalizing your opinion is not debunking, if that’s what you’re trying to imply.
There’s a reason doing something like that is usually bannable in most MMOs should the multiple accounts interact with each other on any way.
Another great day of Blizzard giving us the the ability to multibox if we so chose…thank you Blizzard for the opportunity. 
2 Likes
It’s simple logic in understanding how the game works instead of making a ridiculous claim that buying a few pieces of 475 gear will suddenly let you “win the game”.
3 Likes
Still didn’t answer my question. Who debunked it? You?
You said “This has already been debunked.”
If I tell you that you are wrong about something, do I get to echo to you that you’ve been debunked? That’s not how things work.
Keep us updated on the progress! I spent a chunk of my evening on a druid team camping levelers in Redridge. Hilarious when they see a handful of druids pop out of nowhere, then they rez and see it again… and again. lol
Not getting that free xp while I’m around.
You’re not going to upgrade your cape by doing that, Anon.
Why are you so hung up on who debunked it?
You made the claim that it was debunked.
I’m asking by who. If it was a credible source, that’s one thing. If it was you, then the comment holds no water and is still up for debate.
It’s debunked by having an understanding of how the game actually works.
1 Like
There are none on the internet.
That’s not how debunking works. And I like how you keep dodging the question. That leads me to believe that you believe you debunked it. That being said, it has not been debunked.
Who did the debunking doesn’t matter. The evidence still remains the same. The only reason to focus solely on the person is because you don’t care about the evidence. You just want to launch another ad hominem attack instead of ever coming up with an actual argument.
Oh good lord… 
Evidence only holds water if it’s backed up by sourced references, not by what some random guy on the internet personally feels.
Nope, I just shake my head whenever I see clowns who claim things have been debunked when it was just that they personally disagree and follow it up with their own rationalizations. Or people who quote themselves as a reference.
By your logic, I can say “Rankin, you are wrong because I’ve just debunked you”.
The evidence is backed up by the game itself. Simply buying a couple 475 pieces will not make as huge a difference as Poize claimed it would.
Try again when you can debate the actual topic at hand instead of attacking me.
That’s not debunking anything. You’re giving a generalized location followed by your opinion. If that’s how debunking worked, we could just go around saying “I disagree, therefore, you’re debunked”
I’ve already given my opinion on the topic. I just happened to see your gem and wanted to “debunk” it because it’s always funny seeing people try and win conversations simply with word gymnastics and no actual rationale.
That’s not what I’m saying. Try again.
1 Like