No, I sure didn’t. But I will suggest, based on your comment, that you rarely see a boxer with 20+ accounts in the first place. I’d say it’s safe to say that you’ve probably never even seen a boxer with 20+ accounts and if you have it’s been a one time time thing. 20+ accounts is pretty rare in this boxing community. I have 10 active accounts, add up how much I spend each month in gold to fund those accounts… then double it. It’s much harder to fund 20 accounts than 10 due to node tapping rules. I’d also say it’s safe to say that you aren’t aware of how farming works with boxing since you used the number 20. lol
1 Like
responding to your argument there…its not a Nice try
It sounds exactly like that’s what you are suggesting.
Just because you fund all of them doesn’t mean others will, some of them use 10 accounts to fund 1 character to gain advantage. some of them just like to insta shot people in WPVP. The point is, Multiboxing is P2W and it’s an exploit of the game, people abuse it. So long as it can be abused it should not be allowed. It doesn’t matter what YOU do with multibox, because you are just one person, you can be that rare unicorn that only just does it for fun, but as long as its exploitable, it should not be allowed.
1 Like
How do these players give one of their characters an advantage?
You don’t get to define what is and isn’t an exploit, Blizzard does.
it cannot be “abused” since it’s allowed. That’s like me claiming that you are abusing the heroic dungeon LFD queue tool.
I don’t have to try, you don’t have a logical argument in this conversation.
2 Likes
Uh, Let me guess, funneling gold earned by 10 chars simultaneously to 1 char?
No Blizzard doesn’t get to define the meaning of the word exploit, they can say it’s not an exploit within their game, It’s their rules, but it doesn’t mean it’s not an exploit in the eyes of the players.
Then why did they get rid follow for BG? its because boxxers abuse it, Blizz knows it can be abused that’s why its actively introducing measures to make your lives harder as a boxer, what we are on the forums is that there are still plenty of abuse happening (node farming, AH flush, WPVP) that Blizzard should remove the mechanic as a whole.
How does gold funneled by 10 characters give them an advantage. There are no advantage potions for sale anywhere, so I’m curious.
Our opinions don’t matter, we don’t make the rules. It’s not an exploit here.
Nope. That was actually because of botters, not boxers.
The more you know.
6 Likes
Wow you think more gold is not an advantage? Let’s see, early game, you are on ilvl 400, I am a multiboxer, i earned 10x the gold you did, I bought 475 gear, trashes you in pvp, pve, anything you can think of. That’s not advantageous enough for you?
I suggest you learn to read, especially the second paragraph about multboxxing.
Umm, you might wanna learn to read. Reread that part about boxing. It WAS NOT removed due to boxing, that was just a side effect. looool
Gear doesn’t buy skill. If you’re bad you’re bad, that gear won’t carry you through PvP or mechanics, which is why many players hate raider.io. They think their ilvl means they should be able to chill in higher content than they belong in.
1 Like
“We were ok with it also resulting in multiboxing in multiboxing in battlegrounds also going away due to the poor experience it can create for others.”
“as the effect of multiboxers in those situations is considered unfavorable by many.”
Not sure which part is so hard to understand for you.
It doesn’t matter what your skill level is, an advantage is an advantage, its not a guaranteed win, even if I have low skill level, the facts are, 475 ilvl gives me an advantage against you vs 400 ilvl, whether I win or not is another story, the advantage is there regardless.
1 Like
Do players that buy tokens also partake in exploits? Or is that different?
k, so it was a side effect. You first claimed it was removed due to boxers, I proved you wrong. Give it up. lol
2 Likes
No tokens are also P2W, I’ve made that very clear in my previous posts. Essentially WoW is a P2W game since the introduction of Tokens, except for some completely skill locked contents. It’s sad but it’s not going to go away, since that’s how Blizzard earns money now.
Does it matter? If Blizzard really thinks boxing is fair then It would have introduced some mechanic to save boxing, the fact that they acknowledge the community’s dismay at boxing shows they know that it’s exploitable, they kept it due to greed not anything else.
It does matter, especially when you said:
I gave you proof that you’re 100% wrong and you still cannot accept it.
I’m not trying to be rude but I am not going back and forth with someone like you, it’s simply not worth my time. We’ll get nowhere in our discussions since you cannot accept personal responsibility for admitting when you’re wrong and owning it. We are on two different levels.
1 Like
We are indeed, since you can’t find a valid argument to prove boxing is not a problem and not P2W. goodbye is really the only thing you can say.
I cant believe multiboxers pay to group up with broke undergeared scrubs
1 Like
Another great day of World of Warcraft and I would like to thank my fellow multi boxers for keeping the price gouging botter / scam artists on the AH in check. Thank you Blizzard for allowing me the privledge of multi boxing since 2005. 
2 Likes
I appreciate feeling appreciated! Thanks Glenervine!
1 Like
Well, if I were Blizzard I wouldn’t do that because then
“Why do multiboxers get their own server?”
“I want a server just for x”
But I have friends 
Ooof, melee boxxers, they are masochists lol.
Not anymore bro, not anymore
I don’t wpvp
Yeah you tell that to my hunters facing in the wrong direction when I do a huge pull in a dungeon and almost die because they are having a smoke break 
But they can coordinate and flank whereas a multiboxxer can’t.
Just started multiboxing in June, what did I win?! 
If it was an exploit Blizz would have banned it 16 years ago
That’s unfortunate those players feel that way.
That means “We know it’ll affect multiboxers too and are ok with that” 
So they didn’t avoid doing it just to avoid hurting multiboxing. Doesn’t mean they also did it because of multiboxing.
I’ve yet to see anyone show boxing is a problem or p2w
4 Likes
To be fair, I’ve seen plenty of situations where it’s a “problem” however, unless the company feels its a problem enough to act upon, it will remain overlooked.
An example I’ve given before is the first amendment protecting photographers. I can legally stand on the sidewalk in front of your house and point a camera into your windows. The first amendment protects me from you doing anything about it. People do stuff like that all the time. It’s a problem but unfortunately, a protected problem.
And as far as P2W, I understand their rationale for it. They may be technically correct but so what? If some people want to P2W, let them. People with more money always come out ahead in the world.
I played MTG for 25 years. The same rich people were always the ones who won the vintage tournaments because they’re able to bring a deck worth over $50000.
Hey guys just wanted to let you know I am leveling a team of druids right now!
3 Likes
This has already been debunked, thoroughly. Just having a couple 475 pieces (poorly optimized most likely) won’t activate god-mode.
1 Like