Thing is, nobody knows where it came from. The ideas that “dEbUnK” the acronyms (which did exist so…), don’t debunk it. They’re just other projections of where it originated.
All in all: no one actually knows, and we will most likely, never know. So, w/e.
True, but it’s irresponsible for Blizz to only ban one group of offenders and not the others. So, if I can’t say the cuss word of poop…then the idiots spamming hate can’t spew hate speech.
Blizzard puts on a “we care about toxicity” face, but only takes actions against reports. They’re reactive, not proactive, and it’s a total joke. It’s the reason why you can see boost ads in /1 by bots for hours on end. They don’t actively moderate anything in-game and rely on pure player reporting instead.
Ok. So paying someone to monitor chats (LOL not happening) is still reactive. You wait for someone to do something. You react. You ban them.
Automate punishments? The thing about hate speech, is much of it uses words that can not be automated.
It was a serious question? Ok.
Yes. I have literally seen and known people to get banned for hate speech. So now that we’ve covered that people do in fact get banned for hate speech, we can move on…I guess.
Use whatever definition you want, but they don’t do anything for themselves and only act on reports by players. That’s reactive. If they were proactive they’d be laying down the hammer themselves.
They tout about using AI in their automated systems. Someone replacing a letter with a number isn’t hard to figure out.