Okay so they don’t take orders except when they do so they’re not a pet they’re a coworker.
Keep going man
Hey, some games let a “hunter” call for their eagle to do a divebomb attack. Odyssey and Valhalla come to mind. I was merely acknowledging that while they don’t participate in combat, there have been instances where occasional simple commands can be given.
But, I guess you don’t have the mental facilities to see more than what is directly in front of you.
The pet crowd loses hundreds of possible pet options they e bonded with for two decades and the petless crowd is forced to fight with a stupid bird…
Yeah both crowds are definitely not screwed…
What did you call me before, simple Simon was it?
Mhmm im the simpleton here
Oh yea, all those connections with pets that get left in cages forever the moment they think someone cares about them?
That’s not a connection, that’s a felony. A literal Animal Rights Crime.
And they still have access to them, with specs that respect their pets, BM and Surv
Mm pets are not as involved as surv or BM so it’s as simple as what you’re claming
Unless you main as Mm and like to play mm a with a pet
So, we’ve come all the way back to one of my original comments on this thread about hunters wanting the extra damage Blizzard is giving them and keeping the passive damage they don’t use now anyway.
You don’t seem to understand your arguments are predicated on MM hunters using their pets… But they just don’t anymore
I just use SV. Far more close in combat and makes me feel like my pet is a battle partner that Im actually bonded with. Hes more than a fashion show, he and I fight spear tooth and claw, we survive together or we die together.
Not standing at a distance sending them in alone like some coward. Survival is the true hunter! Zug Zug!
3 Likes
WTF is this take? Is your Eagle getting paid, then? With worms and rats?
What???
That’s all a tuning fix… And it’s be a choice between pet and no pet. Just like how BM has a choice between one pet or two pets
See, this is a real connection with your pet. Taming them and then working with them. Not taking them and then locking them in prison for the rest of eternity.
1 Like
A piece of meat from the kill is generally the reward.
1 Like
… except they’re not getting locked in a prison cell.
And their own words state they intend to make it a ‘true pet’ over time.
Alright so just a buncha trolls getting a kick out of a legit mistake in blizzs end and how it effects those players
Tipical GD.
Damn Coromu. You’re one of the real hunters aren’t you. You play a pet class to work alongside your pets. Not to simulate Pokemon
2 Likes
For canines maybe. But that’s if the Hunter decides. But calling your pet a “coworker” is not it.
It’s more of a “family member”.
Yup…
Yet people don’t realize this screws both crowds…
The only people who are happy is the numbers vs utility crowd who don’t have to worry about balancing pet utility and lone wolf
Yea if you take a pet and then never use it, it’s in prison. It does not have the ability to walk around or hunt for itself like it would like to.
MM hunters are currently Animal Rights Criminals. You have no need for the pet why are you taking it. And to those not running Lone Wolf, BM is also getting a redesign in 11.1 so you still have your pet fantasy option.
Just… just shut it lol. You obviously have no idea what it’s like in a prison cell.
Unless of course you wanna find out. Ain’t so hard getting in there, y’know.
There’s a lot about vanilla that is no longer relevant - Warriors are not a pain to level and become gods as you gear them at cap for example.
What Blizzard pitched MM as then has no bearing on the reality of now, where they still do not refer to them as snipers - that is entirely on the community and the misconceptions of what snipers are or do.
Some do and they should be allowed to keep doing so.
1 Like