Maldraxxus leather set

Community General Discussion
41

You have it.

42

visibly worse product? to you, perhaps. I think it fits the entire aesthetic of maldraxxus. It’s UNDEAD, like everything in that covenant.

I think it has a fine amount of effort put into it, and if I had an undead rogue, It would look absolutely fantastic on it.

1 Like
43

No he doesn’t. He has a Gladiator set. The only lich set is the cloth set.

44

I love the Necrolords leather set. It looks like it made from a left over abomination and I’m leveling a leather class just so I can get it .

2 Likes
45

It looks like you crawled inside an Abomination and are now wearing it as a suit.

That is pretty much on-point for Necrolords.

3 Likes
46

Entirely subjective.

1 Like
47

His set looks exactly like what a plate-wearing lich would wear. Because it’s literally what the most well known plate wearing lich wore.

Leather doesn’t look like something anyone would wear intentionally. It looks like something sewn together without a second thought and sent to the front to die painfully.

48

If the extra arm on the shoulder wacked things in combat it would be even better!

49

I really love it, especially because it complements the new Forsaken skin colors.

Of course, it’s a pretty divisive love or hate set that will not be everyone’s cup of tea because the theme is very pointed, so I get where you’re coming from.

1 Like
50

Kalzhun gave you the answer:

It’s no more different than in Ardenweil plate mog which is made of shiny wood and orbs. But instead of wood you are intentionally identical to an abomination.
Again, you may not like that theme, but it is the theme of that covenant and fits perfectly. It would have been the same if leather followed the theme of mail and plate ended up as a huge abomination with more plate and extra arms in order to represent the House of Constructs.

51

Who would that be?

it’s from the House of Constructs. This is quite literally a matter of that you don’t like how the set looks so you think it should be removed.

2 Likes
52

And I would be complaining then too, because no armor class deserves to be the butt of some in-house joke by the developers.

The Lich King.

53

The Lich King isn’t a lich though.

Kel’thuzad is a lich. And besides that set looks nothing like the Lich King. Only similarity is the dark metal.

1 Like
54

He literally is. He’s an undead necromancer, and that is the textbook definition of a lich.

And the well-placed bone/skull designs. And the blue energy aura. And the spikes.

55

I know many people that hate the groot
 AHAM wood plate set. It’s subjective, for you may be a joke but for others it is good enough to use it.

Since Warcraft 3 the Warcraft’s concept of abomination exist and in fact, this was tried on leather before:

It’s based on a lesser abomination that serves as foot soldier and SPY (rogue) in the Icecrown Citadel raid.

Undead spies do not wear anything like that c:
They wear cloth or are abominations :3

56

The Lich King’s soul is not bound to a phylactery. Ergo, he is not a lich. He is a Death Knight.

1 Like
57

The Lich King’s soul is bound to a phylactery. That phylactery just happens to also be his weapon.

58

I must be in the minority because I absolutely love it. Reminds me of going to stinky and rot face in ICC. It’s also a nice change in the color pallet compared to the other sets in the covenant.

2 Likes
59

On the DID? Yeah that’s pretty bad.

60

That is literally the problem I am complaining about.

Not only does it look like it was fished out of something’s stomach, it looks nothing like the other three sets, which all look great.