Honestly, I would say the opposite is true. Much like the phrase “put your best foot forward”, I’d argue that ‘good representation’ should come first before bad. That’s not to say or deny crazier aspects of LGBTQIA don’t exist. Clearly it does just as it does with any other community.
But think about it like this:
If you’re trying to convince someone that LGBTQIA+ are the same as they are they are, you want to show a common ground then build from there.
It’s my biggest beef with media representation of any kind: they always show the most outlandish examples and ignore normal examples which are more relatable.
Examples: have you ever seen mainstream media portray a Pride parade that wasn’t filled with half-naked fetishists acting outlandishly but not show the LGBT Business Owner’s association?
I recall, honestly, despising Will and Grace because Jack was such a characature while Will was played as a normal dude who just happened to like other dudes. But guess who got all the press and attention?
And don’t get me started on Karen, either.
Point is, as someone who isn’t LGBTQIA+ (I have to use all the letters because someone will most likely drag me if I don’t), looking in from the outside: I can intellectually understand the community is vast and varied.
But if my first exposure to any community was a characature, I would turn away. And I’d hazard a guess, you’re much the same way.
Will and Jack can and do exist. But if someone were to throw Jack at me before Will, I’d throw them back and walk away.
Does that make sense? I hope it makes sense.