A time based market exclusive doesn’t show any accomplishments. All it says that you bought into the market trap or just simply was playing the game at the time of the exclusive availability.
Accomplishment base “exclusivity” is fine since anyone can gain them as long as they can accomplish the achievement, no matter what because that is natural exclusivity base on time, effort, and skill. Not forced exclusivity made to manipulate the market.
Because when something is made available to everyone, after it was taken away, it removes value. This is a common thing in life, as exclusivity drives price. If a company does a limited run of a product, people that resell it, know it will appreciate in value because it cannot be obtained. That is why people don’t hold onto rocks from their driveway thinking they would be worth money sometime
you’re legit just spam replying to anyone who doesn’t want their accomplishments taken away from them, you’re legit crying at this point.
won’t pose the same challenges whats so ever and tuning will be off completely. besides there’s no real good reason to bring it back whatsoever. there’s plenty of good tmogs out there.
Says the person who is trying to parallel the Mage Tower in WoW to a teaching mechanism for real life working situations. And somehow it being exclusive to that point in legion, is a good thing because he is under the impression that he does equal or more work than his boss and gets paid less.
I’d love to see proof of this claim. I see “most players” and “vast majority” thrown around a lot here, admittedly by myself from time to time, a habit I am trying to break.
Nah Rhay said it takes away from her happiness around post 500 if other people get it.
It’s toxic.
That’s the root of the fight for her and others like her.
For them “scarcity of pixels” contributes to their e-go rather than taking pride in overcoming the obstacle.
They believe that other people having the opportunity to overcome the same level of difficulty in the challenge to get the rewards takes away from their happeness
It’s toxic mentality produced from a toxic system design:
It doesnt have value. It is an appearance for a item or a druid form skin in a video game. It will have value if they go on the cash shop. But as of right now, the only value it has is the emotional value from working hard and completing the challenge. And if no one but you has it, or everyone and their cousin has it, nothing removes that value except your own perceived slight.
good luck to you selfish folk asking for things you failed to earned, this thread bores me like these topics always do for years.
as much as i want all of the MT appearances i couldn’t earn, I’m not so keen on diminishing other people’s accomplishments for my own benefit. only got the priest and 2 rogue ones.
try to be less selfish, okay? it’ll take you a long way
I’m not the one that said I should teach people that effort = reward champ. Go back and read it all, instead of what you WANT to read.
Actually here, Ill give you the cliff notes:
He claimed kids should be taught that effort = reward
I pointed out, no it doesn’t, jobs prove otherwise (used mine for just one example, but we all have had jobs where we work more than a boss but they get paid more. Thats how jobs work in US)
Then was asked questions more about why my bosses job wouldn’t be available…blah blah blah then you summed up one line as if it wasn’t in a part of a conversation.
Yes, the fight against exclusivity in one video game is not equal in terms of the number of people affected to the fight for women’s rights.
A small story and a big story. On the scale of a single video game, will the fight for the right to receive an eternal chance at a reward be the equivalent of fighting for the rights of women in the world?
…
Not sure if the word “equivalent” is appropriate? Scalability?
Edit.
Can the whole world be viewed as a game and women have changed the rules of the game?
When they said they would no longer be obtainable…didn’t say it was going away for a while, going away for an undetermined time, they said they would no longer be obtainable.
No one did compare the 2. It was used against the opinion that we should just teach our children that the world is the way that it is. If you understand what using quotes means you’d know this.
Not only is the “fight” not comparable in terms of the “number of people affected” the “fight” itself is not comparable. Women risked physical harm to earn the right to vote - you cannot compare that to a few weakly typed words on a game forum. The “prize” isn’t comparable either; the right to vote for women versus a glowy cat form for druids.
Do you really need this explained to you? It’s a catastrophically bad comparison and cheapens the suffrage movement - I mean you realize you’re talking about a video game here, do I have to remind you of that - a video game. A deferential entertainment activity.