Then tell me what you think really happened then.
Well yes, obviously there’s others who were in the same position like Malcolm X and a few others. I’m only picking MLK.jr, because he shows that equality and peace can be achieved without violence or killing people. Or as you put it “Not tolerating the intolerant”.
Plus, (i’m not talking about you) that’s (wanting violence) a dangerous attitude to have for people who assumed any form of disagreement even if it’s agreement, must be bigoted. The sort of “everything is bigoted”, and people unironically say this. It’s bad enough that these terms like racist, sexist, and homophobic and so on, are watered down to a point where they don’t mean anything what they used to, pretty much allowing the actual racists, sexists and homophobes get away… but now were (as liberals) suppose to advocate actual death, actual violence against those in order to “not be tolerant towards the intolerant”?
What do you think the actual bigots will do after they see that comment said “death to homophobes”?
…Do… nobody see the issue with this attitude? This wishing for violence against the opposition? Not even an “umm”?.. Are we not going to consider that maybe, just maybe, that sort of thing will just backfire horrendously?
More importantly, why Blizzard is even okay with this when don’t they have rules against violence against others?..
And i get it, you didn’t talk about anything about violence in your comments, you’re just fed up with all the bigots existing and you want some sort of change to happen, hence that phrase, i get it. I’m just saying, this is for an example, not a solution we should be aiming for, and we shouldn’t have to give up our principles because of that.