you mean like how “MAJORITY OF THE PLAYERBASE WANTS RDF!!!” that the forums keep parroting is speculation?
1 Like
Best take I’ve seen on RDF so far. It makes sense.
1 Like
Not when we have a good amount of evidence that can point in that direction.
Saying that Blizzard did a poll about the subject that never happened is just a lie. There’s a huge difference.
1 Like
They don’t care and you aren’t getting RDF.
precedent doesn’t mean much.
in this context, it means the idea has been tried before and lots of people didn’t like what the feature did to the game.
so if it has precedent, it’s bad precedent.
There are a ton of people here to replay Wrath so clearly the game, as it was, made a positive impression on people.
Also precedent means a lot in this context of listing out silly nonsense ideas that nobody wants vs things that were actually in the game that people enjoyed.
So it having precedent is both significant and good.
2 Likes
the fact that RDF used to be in the game at one point does not mean it should be added again.
Because in blizzards eyes, 20% is a higher number than 80% (only 20% of the people don’t want it, gotta love american math, makes people even argue with a calculator…)
1 Like
The fact that dual specs were in Wrath doesn’t mean they should be added again. They took away the immersive social fun of having to spend gold to respec constantly. I also don’t like battlegrounds and arena existing. I think that if you PvP you should have to PvP in the open world because it is more social and creates a more interactive world of social experiences and immersion. See I can make stupid suggestions too.
3 Likes
Blizzard devs have a loose association with the truth. They listen to their egos rather that actually think.
2 Likes
This is simply not true. What logs are you looking at exactly? I’m assuming you just clicked the latest retail raid and checked all parses for all DPS specs? Am not sure if you are aware but a patch just dropped 2 weeks ago, and WCL separates logs into difficulties and patches, so for the current patch what you’re saying is true…except it’s flawed statistics because Sunwell logs aren’t split into patches. It’s just the whole phase.
So yes while 600k warlocks have parsed in Sunwell there have been more overall parses for the previous patch alone for normal Sepulcher.
sorry to say but you have absolutely no idea how to read logs.
they said the same thing about flying in wod and classic servers
2 Likes
Well it does, but that isn’t the point. The point is that it means it has precedent to being added to the game while things that were never a part of the game do not have any precedent.
And because we are here to play Wrath and not some other game it makes the most sense to leave it as it was.
1 Like
so? an idea without precedent can be and often is just as good an idea as one with precedent.
You’re posting in an echo chamber.
That is why you think the majority of people want it.
100% agree. I personally dont want RDF, but i do want Queue for BGs anywhere.
Same argument can be said about wbuffs in vanilla. Just because you think the devs said it was a bug doesn’t mean they need to take it away.
They allowed cross faction collusion, which was against tos in vanilla.
Stop making sense! Stop it! No RDF because me no want it!! They say no!! So NO!! Stop asking for it!! I don’t even know why I don’t want it anymore!! Errr wait it uhhh it ruins the already empty world! I made so many friends for life leveling my alts in stockades because we had to use the LookingForGroup channel!! My best friends and I we talk all the time. They say funny stuff like; “inv”, “ty”, “can I need”. It’s such an immersive magical experience!! Please don’t take it from me!! My social life will be ruined!!
5 Likes
Every time I bring up that if RDF was implemented without the teleport, the anti RDF people say yes, they’d take LFD like that.
It just goes to show you how miniscule and irrelevant the real problem they have is. The teleport.
It’s a difference between adding or subtracting 60 seconds of game time
1 Like
and the cross server functionality. 