If you like Blood Elves then why do you side with and perpetuate the stances of the Anti-Belfers?
3 Likes
OMFG, ENOUGH!
Nobody is an Anti Blood Elf. Nobody is against Blood Elves. You’re doing a very good job at harassing the High Elf Community, calling us something which we’re not.
4 Likes
Forsaken is a kingdom, not an order.
No, I’m not. Void doing the same things as light is lore breaking.
The void knight properly would fight differently then a paladin. What do you not understand with this? Void and light is polar opposites.
“I don’t have a legitimate arguement, so I’ll call this guys arguements head canon when in fact I’m the one having head canons!”
See I can troll too.
Lore breaking, so no. Void is polar opposite of light.
Wrong, Class skins as a concept was meant for customization, not class combos. Don’t buy what the HE players is trying to sell you about it.
Yes I did, and you choose to ignore it;
There is also examples Zandrae used to;
Learn paladin lore again, I qouted you sources.
says the person who has 0 clue what paladin lore is.
No I have not.
i dont perpetuate the stances of anti-belfers. you have just custom designed windmills to tilt that contain your view of what an anti-belfer is, but it often is not based on how people who play velfs feel. as i said, not a hive mind. i supported playable half elves instead of high elves. didnt happen.
1 Like
Same with you Hyper, the High Elf community are not Anti-Belfers.
2 Likes
Biggest lie on the forums.
Ah… so he’s got you on ignore and can’t see the lore? Gotcha.
A warrior in plate using Void magic is a Void Knight. This isn’t rocket science.
No you really don’t.
My god you are acting obtuse on purpose. 
Wrong. I covered itnand YOU chose.to ignore it. Not surprising.
Youquoted me ZERO paladin lore.
READ YOUR LORE.
Sara’s post literally quotes novels and everything in the Wowpedia article is cited and referenced.
I refuse to indulge this ignorance any longer. You know nothing, you refuse to acknowledge anything and your stubbornness is insane. Goodbye.
1 Like
Not that I have anything against you personally but the company that you keep and the things that you support will always catch judgment on these forums it’s just how it is and that’s further amplified due to some of those people being major undesirables.
3 Likes
i play wow, not horde or alliance, exclusively. when i’m on either one, i want the experience to be satisfying
kultiran druids use death magic in canon, the oposite of life, but in the game they are regular life druid(outside of their shiftforms)
we don’t need this kind of hard thinking to implement lightforged locks and void elves paladins, canonically they can be rift blades or whatever but in game they will be plain paladins.
tul did. not the thornspeakers
And that’s completely okay with me, I have always mained Horde but play Alliance on the side for fun, the storylines, etc. but I have still always been labeled by those people that I’m an anti High Elf simply because I believe that High Elves are Blood Elves and already on the Horde side and I supported/support Void Elves getting void customizations like pink hair and permanent glowing skintones does it make me an anti, no but they still say it.
Heck I even get hated for not supporting Void Elf Paladin because it goes against the lore, so do things I want personally like Draenei Warlock, I mean I’d still play them if they get added but I’d never advocate for the lore to be broken for them to be playable just because I want them, either way I just wanted to point out why some people will always target people despite where your stances fall.
tul and thornspeakers used the same magic, thornspeakers split from drust because they didn’t want war with humans
blizzard just made new lore and add that life and death are in a cycle so being druid and using death is ok. new lore can be added to lightforged and voidelves because light and void are oposed forces but coexist in the same cycle too
4 Likes
they dont take it to the extent that tul did. theyre protectors of ‘the cycle’ like any druid
the point is before drust lore druids and death magic weren’t compatible but blizz made the proper lore
the same can be made with void and light as death and life share the same kind of “in cycle but opossed” relationship
apples and oranges
this mobs whole raid mechanic is creating fel fire and void fire apply debuffs and if you have the wrong debuff when you touch fire you blow up, so yes op there very much is a canon version of this so cannon even raiders have to know it
Paladins are priest who fight in melee range and wear heavy armor. Shadow priests exist.
The absolute best thing Blizzard could do moving forward is to stop listening to players like these. Sacrificing gameplay for the sake of lore will be the slow decay of this game. It’s an old fashioned mindset that lore-Andy’s will cling to until the servers shut down.
Flexibility and interesting combinations are better for the health of this game in the long term, and are tenants of modern, better games.
Cross faction gameplay, account wide rewards, alt-friendliness of are to the betterment of the game, and are all efforts related to an increased level of flexibility in player choice. More class combinations, be it void elf pallys, blood elf druids or tauren rogues are in the exact same school of flexibility-based design/thinking.
And each step Blizz has made into cross faction, or even account wide rewards/alt friendliness has been met with detractors that would see the game be literally wow classic. And here we are again with class/race combos this time.
Velf pallys…blood elf druids, and whatever…It’s going to happen someday - and when it does, the game will be better for it.
Is There Concrete Evidence That Light And Void Actually Causes Someone To Die In An Explosion Of Fel?
Nope. /thread.