…without justification. You claimed based upon a presupposition of how to interpret someone else’s RESPONSE to your claim. Your demand could be met with:
Trying to point to any of this as “Ha! See! They did X which means Y!!!” when you have zero connection between X and Y is silly. You can’t even justify why anyone should take your request seriously, let alone accept its terms.
Sorry, I’m too busy laughing at people who call themselves “daddy”.
That’s why you ban Discord just like they do other software.
It should.
Discord on your computer should be a bannable offense.
yep let’s also ban anyone using in-game tools made by blizzard.
Yes.
lmao 10 chars
Those aren’t real words.
So, you’re saying that picking your team ahead of the game really does not have any impact on the outcomes?
Neither is that.
Hold my beer.
Still waiting for a legitimate reason to outlaw Discord. Probably gonna be waiting a long time because there is no reason.
It’s true and you know it’s true.
Because people are using it to create an unfair advantage in battlegrounds.
Right blizzard is known for banning a lot. Specially bots and cheaters 
I really enjoyed your breakdown of tautologies as I never got a chance to take a symbolic logic or an advanced math class, and though I had heard it mentioned in passing I never really got to dig into them. I went and looked it up for more info after reading your explanation and I’m really glad I got to expand my knowledge.
After double checking it against other definitions, I have to say your analysis of Cauchy’s argument is spot on.
Glinda.
those who cared about their problems more than about community problems are more likely rolled overpopulated faction
One percent of a million is still a lot.
Many people run it on a separate device. I do.