You’re not wrong.
lmao…I dont think YOU comprehend the concept of ‘evidence’ lol.
When all those accusers are interviewed and stories line up with dates and facts AND you even have CURRENT employees supporting these women…youre little dismissal of all of this will be shown for the joke that it is.
Except we know more than just the information presented in the papers, people have been speaking out including current employees. You can’t sweep this under the rug, the cat is out of the bag.
are you insinuating that the accusers are ALL liars? lmao
And that current high level employees supporting them are as well?
Many of us will not be working today in solidarity with the women that came forward. The statements made by ABK do not represent us. We believe women, and we will continue to strive to do better and hold others accountable. Actions speak louder than words.
https://twitter.com/Muffinus/status/1418671731326078976
No, he is simply trying to win an argument on the internet. There for he is not implying anyone is wrong, he is insisting he is right.
Fran Townsend is literally paid to do damage control for company issues so the company doesn’t lose value. She’s an executive. Her job is to attack any entity that threatens company profits.
More facts, oh how discombobulated this mess is becoming with all these facts being introduced.
The disturbing part in my mind is how AnYONE can see MULITPLE accusations and an investigation of a couple years AND current employees in support of the accusers AND THEN worry MORE about their game being negatively affected than being concerned about the VICTIMS of the abuse.
Humanity is lost.
We need to turn this planet over to some other animal who can do a better job of pretending to be intelligent.
are you insinuating that the accusers are ALL liars? lmao
And that current high level employees supporting them are as well?
No. I am saying that anyone can make any claim and therefore the state MUST file even without proper evidence other than a person saying it happened. And because of that reason I don’t believe either side. I just don’t. I’ll let it play out like it should before passing judgement on either side.
I am saying that anyone can make any claim and therefore the state MUST file even without proper evidence
And this is incorrect on every level. A case must provide adequate and compelling circumstance and preponderance of evidence before it can be filed, otherwise it is turned away by the clerks office.
Fran Townsend is literally paid to do damage control for company issues so the company doesn’t lose value. She’s an executive. Her job is to attack any entity that threatens company profits.
it really was that obvious, wasnt it? lmao.
Between her and the one release, added to employees currently working for the company standing in support for victims…this case is already set in stone…GUILTY AS CHARGED… lol
So you’re insisting that the lawsuit is a bunch of BS and that the woman who had
nude pictures of her leaked and harassed towards suicide by a male employee because of it is still alive and dandy?
When do you people ever get the idea that suicide is a damn joke? Like f’ing hell I don’t know what’s worse. The lawsuit or the people trying to defend Activision and Blizzard in all this.
One trash thread wasn’t enough for you, so you had to make a second one on another character?
Seriously. Haven’t we learned this? Just because someone files a suit and makes claims doesn’t make it so. Not defending either side, just saying that just because it is printed on a legal filing doesn’t make it true or factual.
I am saying that anyone can make any claim and therefore the state MUST file even without proper evidence other than a person saying it happened.
which is why they spent TWO YEARS investigating. What a hoot.
And because of that reason I don’t believe either side. I just don’t. I’ll let it play out like it should before passing judgement on either side.
and I will look at the FACTS and EVIDENCE and make my own conclusions.
- MULTIPLE accusers.
- the company inadvertently admitting its been a thing for a decade, at least.
- the company’s release pretty much an admission of guilt with the ‘but’ excuse all thru it.
- CURRENT employees standing in support who clearly knew it was going on.
its over. doesnt matter if you dont like it or not. Guilty as charged
If she’s an insider, what does it matter that she hasn’t been there for decades?
So you’re insisting that the lawsuit is a bunch of BS and that the woman who had
nude pictures of her leaked and harassed towards suicide by a male employee because of it is still alive and dandy?
Why do you assume that is what led her to it? She was a stable model citizen until this one incident that ALLEGEDLY happened? Give me a break. Did she get reincarnated to tell the government what happened? Seriously, how do you know that’s fact?
If there was not sufficient evidence to support the case its filing would be denied and we’d never have heard of it. Not very educated on how case filing procedure works now are you?
Incorrect. I could go down to the a court house grab paperwork for an ex-parte (restraining order) make claims how you are stalking me, harass me, threaten me blah blah blah. And even though thia is not true the courts would grant it and you would be served. All that has happened has been some paperwork was filed claiming some people did some serious stuff and they are going to allow the prosecuting office to present evidence.
If she’s an insider, what does it matter that she hasn’t been there for decades?
Women being harassed and groped.
A woman is suddenly hired just months ago right before this all blows up to say 'nothing to see here folks, Im a woman"
it matters.
So you’re insisting that the lawsuit is a bunch of BS and that the woman who had
nude pictures of her leaked and harassed towards suicide by a male employee because of it is still alive and dandy?
hey…nude pics and dead bodies arent evidence in some states.
States of Delusion, that is lol
(restraining order)
Restraining orders are not on the same level as civil and criminal action filings. And even with a restraining order you must show circumstance. Civil and criminal filings are held to a higher level of scrutiny due to the implications of the filing. Restraining orders are not.