Oh yea, we’re all range haters totally ! You got that right, SCREW YOU HUNTER, IM ONLY PLAYING ONE CAUSE I HATE IT.
-_-
19 melee vs 17 ranged isn’t a big difference anyway… or rather 14 melee vs 11 ranged DPS.
- 51% can be “mostly” because it is “most”, a majority by definition.
- I don’t believe you actually play a hunter.
- There is a huge difference between a caster and physical ranged dps. So it’s really 14 melee vs. 9 caster dps vs. 2 physical ranged dps
14 Likes
A true hater you are I guess. No one playing hunters except the RSV lovers!
No, its the same… they are both ranged dmg. And if you want to play that card… old SV hunter goes into caster dmg.
Been MM since Vanilla and never cared for RSV, so try again.
They’re not.
It doesn’t exist anymore so you could put it in melee for all it really matters.
7 Likes
I’m genuinely curious. The way I see it, it’s not a melee-vs-ranged thing, but rather… hm, what’s the word? Archetypes, that’s the word!
I mean, when you ask people to describe roles found in fantasy games and stories, you’d get the usual: a priest/cleric, a mage/wizard (both “good” and “dark” types), a warrior, a rogue/thief, a shapeshifter, and an archer/ranger. Oh and a shaman.
Right there, it’s immediately obvious that archers are a very, very different archetype from wizards. People don’t lump them together.
But it seems that you do? Am I understanding your position correctly?
EDIT: the “RSV=caster” thing? Because RSV had some elemental-based damage? That’s not exactly accurate; a good portion of RSV’s damage was from poison. That’s more of the rogues’ thing. So you should be saying “RSV=rogues,” if you’re gonna use the caster argument too.
18 Likes
People were actually. It just wasn’t as common because most people understood that it would never happen because Hunter was a ranged class.
From what I’ve seen the only topics that contain this discussion are topics that are about Survival. Not every single thread. As for why we are ‘arguing’, it is because there are trolls on the forum (such as Azagorod) who, without reason, oppose bringing ranged SV back as a forth spec, and deride anyone who wants it returned. That’s the only real argument here: sensible gameplay feedback about returning a deleted spec versus senseless derision against people who want said spec returned.
There will always be an excuse to not talk about ranged SV. There was a troll a while back demanding people stop talking about it because it wouldn’t come back in Shadowlands. My response to them was the following:
Your post wasn’t as nearly as combative as the trolls, so don’t take the tone as being against you. I just wanted to express the same point I did here.
Assassination Rogues confirmed caster spec.
3 Likes
I would assume they added melee to survival because hunter used to be melee and ranged. I know it was basically a ranged class and because of mechanics they had to let them use melee weapons but because of that fact melee has been a part of hunter since classic. Im not say they should be ranged or melee, i am just stating what I am aware of.
Opinion wise, I love melee survival as it is the only naturey melee class i can play while still being a blood elf. Survival hunter melee is basically a dnd ranger which I really like. And the only nature class that actually lets you use melee weapons. Druid doesn’t really count as they have to transform to be effective.
Til blizz states to the hunter community as a whole that melee survival is staying as is and to get over it and realize range survival was dull.
Sure dude, just like it stayed how it was in Legion. Oh wait.
3 Likes
we shouldn’t be arguing between which deserves to be in the game. just keep melee survival as is AND MAKE OLD SURVIVAL A FREAKING SET OF TALENTS FOR MARKSMAN LIKE WAS PROMISED!
this isn’t an either-or situation. we can have both. people are just too stupid to realize it.
2 Likes
Blizzard failed at making it an option for MM. Besides, why should a large chunk of MM’s talents be taken from it to allow ranged SV to exist? Reintroduce ranged SV as a fourth spec. That will make everyone happy.
16 Likes
Or maybe let more skills be class skills and actually unprune the classes like they say they want to. That way we get more skills to choose from.
1 Like
while you have a point, lets not act like MM uses most of its talents anyway. Most of MM talents in BFA weren’t worth taking and their single target set up for most the expac barely deviated from their one build.
3 Likes
Blizz being bad at making good talents in multiple rows doesn’t mean RSV should be forced into MM.
15 Likes
No it doesn’t but the point is, MM could spare the spots very easily.
1 Like
Yeah, spare the slots and water down my spec… ef that. Give RSV it’s own spec and stop trying to force multiple playstyles into 1 spec.
13 Likes
That just means that Blizzard done messed up there too. Them getting their act together and figuring out how the heck to actually design the Hunter class would hopefully mostly resolve all of these issues.
17 Likes
That would be nice.
1 Like
other than by not doing it, how did they fail? we never got black arrow. we didn’t get explosive shot, just that piece of crap skill shot with the name. we didn’t get any of old survival.
1 Like
When people say to add SV into the MM talents, I question if they’ve even played bfa MM or the old survival.
11 Likes