I kind of love the statement that the devs should âbe honestâ, implying that theyâre somehow being dishonest for not adding something they never said theyâd add.
High elves? Like, nightborns high on ancient mana?
This implication, that she was merely one of six equal members, isnât accurate â she was, explicitly, promoted to be the leader of the Council.
(And, ironically, the one who most fervently argued in her favor was Aethas Sunreaver).
They promoted tradition by opposing the Blood Elves being admitted into the Kirin Tor; they enforced law by carrying out orders given by the highest authority in the city.
A fair point.
I donât think of the Silver Covenant as being in the right, morally, but thereâs no doubt about the legality of their actions â Jaina, as well as the other four members of the Council of Six, were entirely aware of what was happening throughout their city and not one of them raised concerns over laws being broken.
The majority of all deaths occur topside, and there are only two instances (one of which is inadvertent) in the sewers which could qualify as âcruelâ.
Itâs not a contradiction.
They Kirin Tor invited the Sunreavers to Dalaran; the Kirin Tor also uninvited the Sunreavers from Dalaran. Just the reality, Iâm sorry this offends your delicate sensibilities.
Thatâs because a few of these posters are incapable of staying on point (youâll notice an egregious amount of ad hominem, without anything substantive to add to the discussion at all).
Citation Needed.
Iâve never argued this, ever. Again, youâre arguing with a boogeyman.
Now, doing it on the same postâŚ
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Agreed!
Thatâs why I just use the ignore feature and stay on topic, most here to troll or go off topic, to get peeps mad and get thread closed.
Hereâs a comment on topic:
You got two options for them already. Stop focusing so much on a tooltip.
which says that sheâs still part of a council and not a unitary ruler. She may have some additional powers and responsibilities, but the ruling body is not her but the council as a whole. The problem here is that she got away with what she did, possibly because she took out one of her fellow council members.
Not really, subduing unruly Sunreavers topside is not âcruelâ and nowhere near as controversial as feeding them to sharks, or drowning them in the sewers, the fact that youâre actually trying to correlate those two things is extremely telling.
Itâs clear the ânatureâ of these killings was far more cruel and unusual in the sewers because like much of the crime in Dalaran, itâs much easier to carry out in secrecy than topside. If youâre honestly trying to pretend otherwise you either didnât pay attention to the nature of the sewers in dalaran, or youâre intentionally ignoring it to suit your agenda.
I was willing to give you a chance to prove that you were being sensible, but the more stretching, and back bending you do to justify clearly cruel and unusual acts of murder in the sewers paints a pretty clear picture of your position here.
Have you ever seen Orgrimmar?
Do you think an orc would ever be afraid of pointy things?
I just want helmets and hair in general.
I couldnât wear wolf pelts without destroying my braids before SLs, it took the orc level down.
Ethnic cleansing, collective punishment of innocent people, attempted genocide on a larger scale than Teldrassil.
This is referring to Jaina specifically, yes?
Yes, it is.
And as leader she was outvoted by the council when they were allowed back in. If she could not override it then, was she really supposed to have the power to act on her own? I mean if her being the leader couldnât override what the rest of the council wanted, should she have been allowed to decide on her own to massacre civilians?
could be some form of martial law was invoked and there was not enough time to gather and vote, that the sunreaver community was an immediate threat
I donât think the civilians trying to flee for their lives were that much of a threat.
Under no kind of martial law is ethnic violence defensible. Much less because they were innocent of what they were accused of. But even if they hadnât been, itâs no excuse.
Of course the Sunreaver community wasnât a threat, as the facts bore out. Jaina acted without those facts, without calling a vote of the Council (that is written anywhere in the lore - some will no doubt suppose there was one), and her orders were completely over the top.
We all saw just how much reverence for the democratic governance of the Council she had when she poutcrashed out of Dalaran after they voted to allow the Sunreavers back in. Her way or the highway, and itâs a good thing for Dalaran she chose the Highway. Now itâs truly the neutral gathering place, as home of the decidedly neutral Kirin Tor, it always should have been.
Clearly Dad(gar) knows best.
yea ofc. im just trying to come up with a reason jaina can bypass a council vote. declaring they pose a significant and immediate threat to the city is the only thing i can think of to forcibly remove them and use deadly force if they resist before anyone can consider the repercussions
im not going to pretend to know dalarans laws but i would bet theres something there that allows the leader of the kirin tor to act without requiring a council vote in an emergency. jaina just abused her power and twisted the kirin tor to suit her personal needs as rhonins ghost said to her in thros during bfa
Dalaran maintaining that ancient tradition of remaining Alliance-aligned.
This whole discussion is because you think dangling people over pools of Sharks is âLaws and Traditions of Dalaran.â