Not if they actually gave high elves their own model.
2 Likes
Npcs are not proof.
If you use npc as proof, then i say all npcs are immortal. Since they respawn after being killed.
Clearly YOU donât know what that is becauseâŚyou have none other then conjecture, still waiting on your proof iâm wrong.
Still waiting for you to prove me wrong. I mean the other one backtracked after first trying to say they didnât say i was wrong, then when it was pointed outâŚthey ran off.
Still waiting for you to prove iâm wrong thoughâŚand you got nothing. And no matter how many times you say it, i still win if you have no proof.
But thereâs nothing that says that they look different.
Imo, the main thing with this is that changing their skin would defeat the purpose of making them different in the first place.
It would be like giving nightborne a flat purple skintone⌠there would be outrage, and there should be. The same applies to Void elves.
1 Like
Thereâs nothing that said a lot of races looked different until they did.
It would be more like giving the Nightborne night elf body options.
2 Likes
I didnât say âcrack squadââŚso
I also didnât make a whole 2 named NPCâsâŚso
I also didnât make a starting area the size of a pimpleâŚso
So, let me know when you can disprove what i said. Until then all you have is âno you canât use NPCâs⌠because it doesnât fit what i sayâ.
I guess I have to explain this again.
You made the claim.
That means the burden of proof itâs on you.
I can claim the sky itâs green and choose that hill to die on, but if I someone asks me for proof of that, I canât simply say that someone else has to prove me wrong, because that would be foolish.
3 Likes
Burden of proof is a legal duty that encompasses two connected but separate ideas that for establishing the truth of facts in a trial before tribunals in the United States: the âburden of productionâ and the âburden of persuasionâ In a legal dispute, one party is initially presumed to be correct, while the other side bears the burden of producing evidence persuasive enough to establish the truth of facts needed to satisfy all the required legal elements of legal dispute.
Yeah. You do not know what it means. Npc numbers is not a convincing argument.
3 Likes
How does the number argument keep getting dragged up?
1 Like
So like Void elves.
And round and round we goâŚ
1 Like
Simple look at the voidelf leader.
Because thereâs only a handful of High Elves
It makes zero sense for them to exist as their own race
2 Likes
Void elves werenât even in the game at all until they became an AR.
High elves could easily be given a differentiated model.
And YOU MADE THE CLAIM IâM WRONG, the burden of proof is on you.
Thatâs not how that works, i made the claim and pointed to what you donât like as proofâŚyou have nothing to disprove me. So the burden of proof is still in your court.
And no amount of you sayingâŚNO U makes any difference until you can disprove what i said.
This IS your opinion, but i am not the one saying
But you have nothing to disprove my claim. Let me know when you get it.
imagine trying to equate a few outliers as being equal to or even more important than the vast majority of their people 
With playable void elves the numbers argument is void.
Imagine trying to minimize entire populations of areaâs built around things reflected ingame by calling them âoutliersâ. LOL
2 Likes
outliers of the blood elves? yes thats correct usage my gnome
Outliers of High Elves.