I apologize for missing posts where anyone has said âall High Elves became Blood Elvesâ instead of the lore-based â90% of the remaining High Elves took the name âBlood Elvesââ. Would you link back to one of them, please?
No, thatâs not accurate. 90% of elves in QuelâThalas died, only a 10% survived. Of this 10%, an unkown percentage changed their name to Blood Elves.
Even granting that, it has no bearing on the claim being made that posts saying âAll High Elves became Blood Elvesâ is a claim thatâs been made repeatedly in these threads. This is the statement I responded to:
You and I both know that isnât the case - weâve both been around these threads.
Wasnât it that 90% of the remaining High elves from Quelâthalas changed their name to Blood elves and the rest stayed High elf?
Or was it that all the surviving QuelâThalas High elves changed their name to Blood elves and any other High elves who were not currently at QuelâThalas stayed High elves?
I just checked the Warcraft Encyclopedia and youâre right - it says there that only a 90% of the elves in QuelâThalas survived the Scourge attack, and 90% of these 10% adopted the name of Blood Elves.
My bad! I never knew this, I always assumed that all survivors changed their name to Blood Elves.
Edited: sorry, got myself into a mess with numbers x)
So you made a specific declaration that there have beenâŚ
âŚwithout being to cite so much as one single example?
Blood Elves are High Elves is a claim thatâs been made over and over. There are no High Elves because they all became Blood Elves is not.
There are not many High Elves because the vast majority of them accepted the new name given to them by their leader. is a claim thatâs been made over and over. There are no High Elves because they all became Blood Elves is not.
I wonât search over 40,000 posts in multiple threads (some of them deleted) over two years just to satisfy your curiosity. Itâs been brought multiple times, along with many other stupid arguments, and having a handy debunk for it is good.
What does it matter to me? Iâm tired of people in opposition to playable High Elves getting tarred with unfounded accusations as to our motives, beliefs, consistency in use of lore, or behavior in these discussions.
You made a completely specious accusation that people on the opposing side of this debate have made the claim - over and over - that there are no High Elves whatsoever because they all became Blood Elves. Iâm calling you on it. Pretty simple, Almara.
There are more than enough valid points of contention between the two camps without you simply making things up.
No it hasnât. If itâs true, and youâve made the claim, provide even one example - just one.
And are you saying the same isnât true of the other âtribeâ? I donât paint everyone in the pro-High Elf camp as lore-shredding and insulting people because some few fit that description. I donât do it because it simply isnât true and while I am opposed I have repeatedly said I respect the desire to have them and most of the people asking for them.
You seem to be taking offense to my response that youâve made one when you said that, over and over, people have claimed there are no High Elves because they are all Blood Elves.
Because you made that ridiculous claim and instead of walking it back decided to double down on it.
Is there anyone, for or against High Elves as a playable race, who can cite a single instance of someone posting âThere are no High Elves at all because they all became Blood Elvesâ in these threads? Letâs crowdsource this one and see if someone can help Almara with this.
PS, no fair using my responses to Almara as an example that someone posted it.