well wildhammer do have the option of getting druid. They roughly have lore on the level of what harvest witches were for kul tiras and gilneas and those were turned into full druids
Tattoos the originals donât have, class options the originals donât have⌠and ignore that those that share these points are all on the same side of their originals.
No, because when people asks for tattoos for blood elves, your side will come out of the woodwork to claim how that shouldnât happen because thatâs a âhigh elf thingâ. When people asks for eye customization for blood elves, your side comes out to claim that is a âHigh elf thingâ.
They should give you guys the race that is already playable⌠but the race that is already playable has to be limited on what they request because of a dwindling race of NPCs.
Alamara once said that Anti Helfs tend to like Void Elves because since they consider them inferior to the Blood Elves, they say itâs for other reasons, but in the core it was that. Their opposition to High Elves is a lot due to jealously over some of the concepts and ideas for High Elves, since they thought it was unacceptable for the Alliance to get a âsuperiorâ version of Thalassian Elves.
Back then i thought what she said was nonsense, but now, i see it.
The barriers you guys have set up for this argument is just insaneâŚ
Canât have different models, because XYZ⌠oh but now we just want blood elf modelsâŚ
Give it a rest itâs spam worthy if you have not got anything new to say
class options that blood elves wouldnât have? mate high elves wouldnât have access to death knight, demon hunter, and warlocks. Every other class they would have in common.
How will it impinge on the nelf theme? It wonât anymore than nightborne impinged on the belf addict theme.
No idea what youâre getting at with the rest of your response to me.
Basically they are just trying to skirt around saying âYou canât have high elves because I say soâ
Rpg isnt canon bub.
Atleast the Nightborne stick to the same faction with their themes
tandred wasnât canon until he was. RPG can be used to expand on the lore. Blizzard has been doing this for years.
Or, you know, you could actually read what weâve been saying instead of crafting assumptions (or rather, spouting someone elseâs assumptions). Nowhere have I said that Void elves were inferior, in fact, Iâve consider a lot of things they have to be better, but sure, instead of addressing the point, deflect, and donât forget to go call people out while ignoring the exact same thing happening on your side of the hedge.
Do I have to repeat how people canât asks for options for an already playable race because High elves have an identity so fragile that eye color threatens it?
You are the ones that claim to stick to the lore and that claim to hate how they came out with the explanation for the change of Void elves out of nowhere⌠but somehow a similar type of explanation for a different model would be a-ok if it were for High elves?
Iâm not saying it canât or shouldnât happen, but it would be nice for people to notice the hypocrisy.
Oh, but bumping saying âI support them!â or repeating the exact same fanfictions itâs not spam.
by definition it isnât spam.
Then neither it is to oppose them, you might want to inform that to the night elf.
I am not their keeper. I have no requirement to do so.
Thankfully, the dwarves already have their Allied Race.
But you apparently agree since you upvoted it.
Who was the one again that was claiming upvoting something equals endorsement
And thinking about it, so do Blood elves.
The ship sailed twice; in 2006 and then in 2018.
and there you go assuming we canât have them all but instead we must pick and choose.
not me /10char
You might want to take that to the council then. One step out of line and youâll be shunned for damaging The Cause.
So then a more nature themed high elves being playable alliance side is fine then, since they will be on the same side as the night elves.
Fantastic.