Not but they are just different because of the evolution , again wrong.
You cant see how incorrect you are.
Just need to understand this ; if someone disagree with you , maybe one of both is wrong but if 10 people said that you are wrong ; you should accept that you are not right and stop been pedantic because is sad at this point.
It is stated in game and in lore. The high elves of quelâdanil remark on it being repaired.
Vareesa remarks on its influence again.
high elves conduct pilgrimage to it in WotLK and onward. Theyâre the same people dude.
So why can you not cite them?
Besides it literally being explained in WotLK?
It has nothing to do with evolutionâŠ
I mean, I am citing directly from the game.
Appeal to popularity logical fallacy.
Hint: At one point, everyone knew the sun revolved around the earth, that the earth was flat, and that illnesses were caused by imbalanced body fluids of black, red, yellow, and white.
Have a good day, and I highly suggest you bring back all those books you cited. Along with the proper use of pedantic when you mean stubborn, or obstinate.
Fyre, there is an RP and fanfiction page in the lore section of the forums.
Maybe you can post this stuff there⊠maybe you can post about a world were the Blood elves never renamed them selves and never siphoned magic from living creatures for survival after the scourge destroyed quelthalas⊠because this is the way it sounds when you talk about the non blood elves.
It doesnât even make your own case when you deny that there are high elves that never left the alliance. The group as a whole may have formerly left⊠but as blizzard has proven out, we have always had high elves in the alliance, even before your âno hubsâ statements.
Big difference (again) they were discovering something new . Instead you are trying to apply something that you are not even the creator or can even modify anything , . ⊠AGAIN not point of comparison.
You ARE JUST SOME RANDOM PPL THAT IS TRYING TO PUT SOMETHING THAT IS ALREADY DONE .
NOT THE SAME.
Ez questions:
Did you create the lore ? NO
Can you change the lore ? NO
Do you have any impact in the lore ? NO
Are your oppinion is enough relevant to make you statement true ? NO
So stop trying to think that what you are saying is true because IS NOT AND NOT WHAT MOST OF US ALREADY KNOW
Appeal to popularity fallacy means you claim someones argument is wrong because it is unpopular. Many of the views I pointed out were originally unpopular but correct. This is what you attempted with me.
I am sorry, but what? I am not sure what exactly you are stating here. I asked for you to point out the books that support you, and you refused. Hell, the gameâs description of blood elves state they are high elves. SoâŠ
What?
What?
it is true because that is what the lore and the game says.
It is what you THINK you know, but that is not the fact of the matter.
niobeans, half way between a gnome and a human, a halfling of sorts. the high gnomes derive from a newly discovered planet in the vicinity of argus. though small, the planetâs core is extremely heavy, creating a higher gravity field and stronger atmospheric pressure than azeroth, as a result, everything is shorter and thinner than it would be on azeroth.
plants, animals and sentient species of niobe, are pleasantly diminutive, quick, agile, mischievious and hyperactive. niobeans can consume 3 times the food of the average human and 5 times as much as their distant cousins, the gnomes of azeroth, and still remain slender and alert, all thanks to their fast metabolism.
There is zero lore you can cite about alliance high elves besides a few individuals exist. Unlike the pro position the anti position is backed by lore and development
Everything about the sc elves implies they were neutral this whole time, so unless you can cite something, it took the horde coming to dalaran for them to become a possibility. They were not fighting for the alliance in any capacity before this anywhere
As blood elves make up well over 90% of the living high elf population they are the playable high elf story. They control and make up the high elf state. They are the center of high elf culture. There is no alliance high elf army or state in the alliance. The lore also doesnt say this other 10% went alliance just some didnt accept it, it specifically says a few individuals remained loyal to this day
Every body obviously interpretes the SC differently.
I donât see how people can literally call them neutral. Their absence in BfA does not matter, we have already established this. If they were neutral then here would be no need to for them, they would just be a militant group within the Kirin tor, and wouldnât have needed to form the SC in opposition to the Sunreavers. Who are major horde sympathizers.
Your fan fiction is that you are presenting that there are only a âfewâ individuals⊠around the numbers of 5 that are alliance aligned.
For the record⊠if they are neutral then you as a horde player should be able to gain rep with them. But you cannot.
We just keep getting the mech themes recycled. It was a fun game to play with my friend, but I just have not played in a while. I check up for new additions, but itâs few and far between anymore.
Wow, the poster with most lore knowledge here is the âirrational oneâ. I like how Alamara can list lore sources all the day and you are like âi donât want to talk with anymore, youâre irrational, iâm too good for youâ.
Do you have a phobia of lore or basic knowledge?
They really handle Trust 3 to everyone these daysâŠ
Which is why I said these are the numbers based only on the losses that we know. Before we consider any losses, from any campaign, the ratio already rests at 1:8.
Though ultimately, as Kirela states, it wouldnât matter one way or the other â it has been demonstrably proven that even as few as a dozen disparate individuals existing is a big enough presence to warrant playability.
Theyâre certainly arrogant, but to the same degree as Blood Elves? I donât knowâŠ
That said, if it were choice between the two, Iâd definitely prefer to see the HEâs depicted as being overly-haughty rather than overly-servile.