Are you really saying that loot share groups won’t gear up faster than actual Vanilla mish mosh groups?
One thing talked about earlier in these forums was group comp.
How sometimes a lock or hunters pet would be tank.
With loot sharing. As a plate wearing warrior why bother with a mish mash group when I can get 3 other warriors that are willing to swap gear?
Hell allies can even grab a holy pally so tge whole group is plate.
Cloth. Same thing.
Leather same thing.
This won’t take long to catch on and now the social and group dynamics are changed!
I do not remember any posts in that thread having been “hidden” due to being flagged, though. I did not go back to read the entire thread after it had been locked, though.
Would that thread being locked due to tickets/reports have also generated a reason which the OP could have seen?
iirc. Every thread I’ve seen locked here has a reason at the bottom.
First one I’ve made that has been locked.
That one does not have a reason at the bottom and the GM’s profile is hidden. Lol
First GM profile I’ve seen hidden too. Thats why I think it was a bot. Along with no reason given.
Then again. It’s locked and not just hidden so Idk. Lol
Honestly don’t care. 3 threads was getting confusing. I gleaned the info I was looking for.
It is all being processed as we speak. Lol
Its not my opinion it is fact.
Guild banks did not exist in vanilla and it really is the only valid argument the anti guild bank people have.
Now if for some reason you feel it isn’t a valid argument I am not quite sure what to say.
its your opinion that they are “the only one needed in every single gb thread”
but if you want to pass that off as fact, you do you.
we are not arguing that guild banks were in classic, they weren’t, what we are debating about is if they should be in classic. You may believe that the fact they were not in vanilla means they shouldn’t be in classic. That is your opinion.
no one is arguing that guild banks were in vanilla, we are discussing if they should be in classic and what reasons for or against. the fact they were not in vanilla is a reason against having them in classic, but not the deciding factor in and of itself.
“should guild banks be in classic?” is not solely answered by if they were in vanilla or not.
It IS the one argument on either side that cannot be countered.
With that one exception, each and every argument on either side has been countered, even if some want to ignore those counters or label them as “invalid”.
Yea and this is something else neither side can counter or deny-It’s at blizz’s discretion and they have already shown they will use that discretion for what they see as the health of the game and what does not effect the core gameplay levleing up, questing, and combat.