Guild Banks Pt. 14

Yes, because your obsession with “proving logs” is far below the bar that is needed to require Guild Banks. And since they’re not required, and not in Vanilla…

We’re not getting Guild Banks.

I’d say /thread, but I know you will never let this go, because you’re obsessed with thieves.

1 Like

People said the same about classic. People said the same about beta. People said the same about…

Look, I understand you’re bored because you didn’t get beta access so I’m not going to keep responding to your pettish trolling. I’m also quite likely older than you, going by your posts.

It’s also difficult to keep running from my smoker to my PC. I’m smoking some spareribs, mmmm tasty.

1 Like

I haven’t seen a 300k petition and a good business case for them yet.

Those people were idiots. There was always going to be a beta, whether it was long or short, open or closed.

There’s a vast difference between one minor feature with an entire plethora of reasons to reject it, and a multi-year campaign with real force behind it.

We didn’t get Classic because people whined. Get over that argument.

There was a business case, and a significant community behind it. Every petty demand isn’t bet satisfied. How’s AV1.5 going? How’s LFG going? How is “Make Dungeons Harder” going?

Saying “If we whine enough, we’ll get our way” is not a valid comparison to the Classic lobby. There was far more effort and good reasoning behind it, as well as a viable business case for Blizzard.

“But da Feeeves!” is not a reason to implement one small feature because a tiny percentage of the population wants it. By and large the respondants to this thread are a handful of proponents, and an overwhelming number of one off posts saying “That’s ridiculous, no”.

1 Like

When I go to a WW2 museum it is authentic when it is authentic. If it had a bunch of Korean War stuff, or Vietnam Conflict stuff, it wouldn’t be an authentic WW2 museum would it?

How do you kids not understand the whole specific point of Classic?

Achievements don’t impact gameplay. Transmog doesn’t impact gameplay. Then a bunch of other things stretching more and more, then why have talents when all the raiders use a cookie cutter build? Why have the defense skill and mechanics? Removing that didn’t impact gameplay really. So why not remove all skills? Hey, rogues using axes doesn’t really change gameplay. Neither does changing the threat mechanics or batching. Since we are at it why not address all the well documented class issues and imbalances until everything is the same and homogenized.

And then we are retail again, except its retail with Less Content. And the same people will be calling for a Real Authentic Classic server because your game sucks. And then they’ll say yes. And then you guys will come in and demand change and more change and ruin Real Authentic all over again.

Just stop. If Classic does well they will open a TBC server and you’ll have what you ant and I’ll have what I want.

1 Like

I never signed up for beta access. I’m not a kid. I’m in my 40s. I don’t work for free or put effort into a character that will be wiped. But great cool edgy kid quip.

Zero chance you are older than me. And your cool guy post count shtick probably works great on the retail crowd. This is Classic.

1 Like

When I go to a museum I expect it to have air conditioning, comfortable benches, a gift shop and hopefully a food court. I don’t expect people to be shooting at me in a museum.

So yeah as far as classic being a museum piece I see no reason not to have guild banks. Especially as they don’t change any core game play mechanics.

yah i’ll never get the need to put an opposite idea down just to help inflate someone’s own suggestion/opposing idea.

You are asking for a major feature from patch 2.3 to be added to Classic. A better analogy would be demanding Stealth Jets be added to the WW2 museum.

1 Like

Guild banks have a plethera of other reasons other than thieves to be added. If you read even 10% of the guild bank threads you would likely have seen that.

There’s one reason to not have them, a dozen of reasons to have them. But hay your ignoring logic in favor of emotions so…

2 Likes

Not really, guild banks while a major feature were not a huge game play feature. Banks are already in the game, all guild banks are is shared bank space the guild can access.

1 Like

To protect blizz IP before it’s lost to abandonware and make a cash grab? Check.

They do. “LFM. Link achieve or no inv”.

Oh? Let’s see economy, pvp assessment, and ofc people will ni ja things when its an upgrade for someo else just so they get their tmog or so I’ve heard.

None of this even remotely has anything at all to do with guild banks.
If any of that is any kind of issue it should be evaluated on their own merits and cons. Same as guild banks.

Not even close. That is also why I said anything should be weighed on it’s own accord. Not “you added guild banks so we should get flying monks”. That is how a child debates their point.

I pwned your daddy in UO son.

2 Likes

The arena is just some side fun I can engage in with a partner. Surely it could be considered as adding a couple arcade games to the food court within the museum of your analogy, right? Who does it hurt?

1 Like

If arena was really just a place you went and had pvp death matches sure that would be a fair comparison. But arena was not, it had a huge impact on the actual game world resilience, massive balance changes, gear only available from arena… yeah far more impactful.

Tee hee! Good one, Dude!

And your examples are horrible considering half this threat is detailed please of how the guild bank will stop rampant thievery, and the lack of a guild bank spawns long term planning of infiltration, destruction, and mass robbery. That seems far more impactful than any of your counter arguments.

At the least it is tie, in which case I will agree we all have great reason to get nothing that isn’t vanilla added to vanilla. We’ll call it a draw and agree to keep Classic authentic.

1 Like

You can list them and I’ll tell you why they are wrong or you can read the thread and see they were already shown to be illogical.

1 Like

So you agree - only vanilla features should be included with Classic to keep it authentic.

I’m glad we can finally agree on this.

1 Like

I beg your pardon. What?

Lot of classic to be played. Lol.

So you agree that non vanilla features should be added if they don’t actually impact gameplay? Glad you agree.

Oof, might be time to mature a bit then.

1 Like