I’m not upset in fact if you took time to look I’m very welcoming of more options it doesn’t bother me. Don’t make me into an adversary to suit your purposes. I’m just suggesting you pay attention more and maybe you’ll understand the topic better.
You’ll have to explain to me how you don’t understand where the people complaining are coming from however… It’s pretty much self evident… Are you actively ignoring them or are you really not sure what they are on about? Because if you are unsure should take time to read and understand than jumping to your own conclusions. That’s reasonable and fair to do.
I don’t recall but people keep listing it and others keep dismissing it.
People keep pointing to an official blizzard statement that the lore team was consulted and people keep dismissing it because ‘that blue isn’t good enough.’
Moved goalposts and cherry picking from people triggered about the shattering of their pale elf fantasy.
I always wonder if all these people pitched a fit at:
a) 50s Bible epics using all white anglo-saxons for Ancient Egyptians
b) Hollywood casting anglo-saxons as Ancient Egyptians and Mediterranean Greeks
c) humans in Stranglethorn Vale being light skinned
I’m already welcome to customization options. However what has taken people so long to drag out to this topic after 180+ posts was this gem.
wow_gamepedia.com/Devi (I can’t post links - actual instance of a dark skinned Blood Elf)
this is what you needed to bring to the table if you did that nicely and politely. Along with your own two cents about how more character customization options is a good thing I’d be right on board with what you had to say. It’s the approach I take issue with. Nothing else.