I used to even be a death knight
3 Likes
I went back and looked I have Shadowmourne on both my warrior and DK so I think thats more than enough. Frostmourne has too much behind it to be used by common heros so personally I would perfer it remain shattered and part of WoWs history you cant deny how much it effected it.
See paladins/ including myself running around with ashbringer mogs, shamans with doomhammers, warlocks with scepters of Sargeras, rogues with the daggers that killed Llane Wrynn, etc, etc, and here we have folks freaking out over some players wanting a Frostmourne weapon transmog 
This forum never lets me down 
2 Likes
He wouldnât do this. If anything seeing it being repurposed might actually make him happy because he considered the original sword a blight. He sure as hell wouldnât reassemble it for the sake of some puissant mortalâs vanity.
You donât know that, you do not write the character
Even more than the flaming sword of fire?
I didnât write the character. But I did play through the expansion on mulitple characters (at least 3 of which were necrolords) and everything about how he regards the forging of the helm of domination and a mournblade implies that he was horrified by it and the implications thereof.
So again: dude is not going to make a copy of it for some random mortal to hang on his wall
All four of those classes get the tmog of it! No need to make it mage specific.
1 Like
Hmmmmm Iâm not sure about that.
The Ashbringer was given to the player, including the corrupted version, but there is a justification for this.
Another thing to consider is that the appearances of the Windrunner bows were also given to huntersâŚ
âŚbut Iâm not sure if that applies to DKs.
My line of thought is : in terms of logic: the Windrunner bows were made in larger numbers because theyâre legacy bows of a family. The Frostmourne is a unique artifact that doesnât have replicas or was âmanufacturedâ more than once.
Now, if itâs just for appearance⌠I donât see anything wrong with providing that eitherâŚbut there is no âlogicâ arg for this.
edit :
the Warglaives of Azzinoth was a drop from illidanâs fall < justification.
Frostmourne was âdestroyedâ < justification to why there is a dual wield frost artifact weapon in legion expansionâŚ
1 Like
I agree actually, thatâs why I was saying itâs more for appearance.
In this logic : other classes have artifacts from important NPCs, such as DHs, paladins, hunters, mages, warlocks (Gulâdanâs staff) - so I understand the point of having an appearance for DKs. One could argue that we even have a mount with the appearance of Deathwing⌠and thereâs no logic in thatâŚ
So, going down THIS cosmetic route just for fun, thatâs ok i guess.
2 Likes
so im a bit late to the conversation, but a lot of the lore about how DKs and undeath in azeroth operates was sort of broken in bfa. ex: there no longer is a lich king controlling the scourge.
additionally the lore about the blades of the fallen prince was sidehorned into the game into order to fit the idea of making frost DK a DW only spec, a move which has been controversial and disliked ever since. even before they settled on this idea, they had a artifact model of frostmourne in the game in case they went back to 2h.
https://imgur.com/JWxv0fM
3 Likes
Heck I might just go back dual wield on this guy to get the dual wield Frostmourne appearance. Just wish it was 2 hand
Just unlock all mogs for all classes, set the mogs free! picket signs
you just traumatized meâŚ
As a DK I hate you!
Letâs make a petition so that Primus never touches anything from the Lich era again!
1 Like
Only if you do so against the wishes of both factions. Kinda like the class Mount quest where you can kill a red dragon for the info.
Showcase your brutalityâŚor your restraint. A rune blade is a weapon of great power, and the temperament of its weilder should change how it acts/behaves.
My sweet summer child
we have countless of examples of characters doing what they would never do in one expansion difference, Garrosh despise dark magic and corruption due to what it did to his father and his people, next expansion he throw his father weapon away, use dark magic and corrupt his people
And you think the primus would be different? get a grip
My sweet summer child
Garrosh was an irrational man child addicted to war, who lacked any core identity or morality beyond an overwhelming thirst for violence.
The Primus is Old in a way that I donât think you can fathom. He has existed since likely before the first titan stirred. He has throughout his existance by all accounts been a thoughtful, rational strategist who forged the realm of maldraxxus on a rational, codified system intended to protect the shadowlands from any external threat. We also know that the one thing he seems to have ever regretted, to have grieved over was that he was made to forge a mournblade.
And yet we are supposed to believe he would do so again for the vanity of a mortal.
You know nothing of logic, writing or plot.
No, he despised Warlocks and Fell Magic. Garrosh Helscream never objected to anything else.
3 Likes
Why? It was broken in wrath ontop of that it wouldnt make sense