Give Death Knights the access to Frostmourne appearance

Yeah, it was pretty bad to not get the appearance

Its even worse when Demon hunters get their exclusive appearance and DKs can’t. But i guess blizzard have their favorites

4 Likes

Im arguing for a possibility for all classs to obtain it, any my reeasoning comes from the simple fact it is not only a DK lore weapon.

And yet every other single DK in existance has become a deathknight without weilding Frostmourne, and their uniquie weapon (Runeblade) is created within the first few steps of becoming a death knight.

1 Like

The frostmourne is a DK weapon, period.

If the blades are exclusive to DH then Frostmourne should be exclusive to Death knight, they have the right to it.

3 Likes

Ah yes just like Atiesh, Greatstaff of the Guardian is unique to the guardian of Azeroth, usable by 4 seperate classes even tho the guardian has ALWAYS been a mage.

1 Like

They should have let Tirion go back home to his bug farm and eat more maggot steaks, did him dirty for no reason

1 Like

Apples and potatoes, not all weapons will work the same

Frostmourne should works like the warglaives exclusives to DH

4 Likes

Shamans got a day 1 legendary in dragonflight, 2h users like ret, dk or war got a legendary down the line, where’s my legendary 1h and shield?

1 Like

Go get Shadowmourne. Its not hard at all anymore.

Shadowmourne is an axe, granted it looks cool. But it’s not Frostmourne.

1 Like

Ya I know I have it on my DK. I am fine with its look we don’t need Frostmourne.

1 Like

So you’re really only in favor of legendary rings and amulets with Mainstat?

Because you can’t feel that way but also be in favor of flavorful, exciting legendaries.

So, we glossing over that the original Frostmourne has been obliterated and the only person that can actually recreate the weapon forged it under torture for a self-proclaimed Death God intent on resetting reality?

Are you glossing over that nothing is rly stagnated and blizzard can create new lore upon older stuff or even retcon past stuff it means it will make a good questline that can be rly good for players who want an appearance?

Why Dh can, but Dks can’t?

3 Likes

The Warglaives were never destroyed and forged under torture. Good luck trying to convince the Primus to reforge something completely abhorrent to his own being.

So tie it to Cataclysm timewalking and let Mages mog it? I don’t see the point of contention.

The logic is that if Glaives are so iconic to Demon Hunters that only they should be allowed to mog them, it should apply to other classes with their iconic weapons as well and there is not a single weapon more iconic to Death Knights than Frostmourne as it appeared from WC3 - ICC.

3 Likes

So?

He created abhorrent armor for us the entire expansion, we saved his butt, the shadowlands and the creation he can swallow it up and do it.

Demon Hunters get the Glaives of Azzinoth, an equally hype legendary weapon, as a transmog appearance, I see no reason why DKs can’t wield the weapon that caused one of the most memorable stories in the game.
Arthas’ story, which is inexplicably tied to Frostmourne, has set, and I don’t see why not let DKs finally get to live out their dream of wielding the Frostmourne.

Sidebar, Brox’s axe at some point would be cool. Strom’kar was cool, but we were robbed as warriors.

3 Likes

Nah. Have you seen DK’s transmogs? Why insult such a goodlooking weapon by giving it to the Philistines of WoW?

1 Like

You’re absolutely right.
All weapons are hunter weapons, and therefore, I would like to revise my support to cast Frostmourne for Survival Hunters.

Tosses Life out of the chat … Wait you did that name on purpose!