It means exactly that, since that is the big excuse you Alliance use to say that the Horde started this war.
You kind of did unless youāre calling Teldrassil and the entire Wall of Thorns a āpolice actionā.
No, I say what sparked this war was the attack on Stormheim, which proved to Sylvanas that peace under Alliance terms is not peace.
And I made my post because it seems people believe an entire nation should be destroyed because of the actions of one person who is their ally.
Yesā¦ much likeā¦ oh I donāt knowā¦ Dazarāalor?
he does not say the same thing, his dialogue for the alliance version is this
King Rastakhan of Zandalarā¦ On behalf of the Alliance, and in the name of King Anduin Wrynn, I hereby request your surrender.
so he doesnāt even mention talanji. and is a lot more calm. the horde just got a unreliable narrator
So basically what you are saying is that the near extermination of the Night Elf race is a measured response to one manās attack on the Banshee Queen?
Is Dazarāalor justified? Yes? Then my answer is also yes.
Also, his attack was not sanctioned by the Alliance, he did so against orders and thusly dragged the Alliance into this war. And the Elves were obviously supporting it since they sent troops to Silithus to fight with the Alliance.
Well, I donāt think Teldrassil was justified so Iām still missing your point in the reply. But are you implying that the horde should have gone to war with just a single person in the alliance and leave the rest alone? Or that they canāt retaliate period if the person who attacked them is playing āyou canāt touch meā in an allied raceās territory?
Went back to find a couple quotes for another thread, indicating the war was not on until Ashenvale.
Letās do a comparison. The Alliance launches an attack on Dazarāalor with the goal of crippling the Horde navy and forcing the Zandalari out of the war. The Horde launches an attack on Teldrassil with the goal of ākilling hopeā. The Alliance goes out their way to avoid civilian casualties, keeps collateral damage to a minimum, and gives the Zandalari a chance to surrender peacefully. The Horde burns a city full of civilians to the ground out of pure spite. Shall I go on?
I dunnoā¦ those Dark Iron didnāt seem to be ātrying to keep Civilian casualties to a minimumā I will call that a lie.
Surely the High King has control of his forces?
Need more evidence that Blizzard thinks Alliance players are soft-skinned milktoasts who canāt take the idea of being the non-heroes?
Such a shame.
Genn would have never attacked Forsaken if we didnāt invade his kingdom and try to wipe out his people.
That does not matter, that has nothing to do with this current war.
It does, we donāt get to ignore the context when itās our side that invades, makes power-grabs, and causes untold loss of life creating the people we complain about on here.
The Horde are responsible for someone like Genn existing.
Okay. If the Horde feels justified in attacking the Alliance in response to Stormheim, fine. If the Horde wanted to fight over Azerite, or the possibility of the Alliance attacking again, Iām fine with that too.
What I donāt like, and what I have been seeing, are players defending Teldrassil burning because of Gennās actions. Iām saying that thatās not a sensible escalation.
That is a reasonable argument, I can go with that, as a person, IRL I agree, the burning of the tree is a bad thing, but I dislike people claiming that this attack came out of nowhere. And I dislike people who are so unconsistant as to support the murder of civilians in Dazarāalor when that is just as bad, especially considering how the Dark Iron were doing it.
Only has control of other nationās military forces, and even then he has to ask permission from other leaders to be allowed to use it.